Let $(\Omega, \mathcal{F})$ and be a measurable space and $(X, \mathcal{G})$ be a vector space equipped with some $\sigma$-field.
A simple function $f:\Omega \mapsto X$ is such that $$ f(\omega) = \sum_{i=1}^n x_i \mathbb{1}_{F_i}(\omega)$$
where $F_i \in \mathcal{F}$ are disjoint sets and $x_i \in X$ for all $i = 1,\ldots,n$.
Clasically, one says that $g:\Omega \mapsto X$ is measurable if $$ g^{-1}(G) \in \mathcal{F}, \quad \forall G \in \mathcal{G}$$
Now, for a simple function $f$ this seems to always be the case, since for any $G \in \mathcal{G}$:
\begin{align}
f^{-1}(G) & = \{\omega \in \Omega \ | \ f(\omega) \in G \}\\
& = \{\omega \in \Omega \ | \ x_i \in G, \ \omega \in F_i \}\\
& = \bigcup_{i \ \text{such that } x_i \in G} F_i \in \mathcal{F} ,
\end{align}
since $\mathcal{F}$ is closed under finite (and countable) unions.
Now, this fact is completely independent of the family $\mathcal{G}$, as long as $F_i \in \mathcal{F}$ the resulting simple function $f$ will always be measurable.
I believe there must be a mistake somewhere.
Why? Well, there is a quite wide* family of $\sigma$-fields which satisfies that the point-wise limit of measurable functions is a measurable function
Therefore, if what I showed here is truth, it would imply that any function that is the limit of simple functions, is measurable for all the family of $\sigma$-fields satisfying the point-wise limit property; this feels like a false statement.
*When are pointwise limits of measurable functions measurable?, Limit of measurable functions is measurable?