By the process of elimination:
- Taking $f(x)=1$ eliminates answers $3$ and $4$.
- Let's assume that $\alpha$ could be nonzero, that is, there exists some $f$ that satisfies both conditions, and $\alpha\neq 0$. Let $\lambda>\neq0$. Then, define $$g(x)=\lambda\cdot f(x) - \lambda + 1.$$ It is then easy to see that $g$ satisfies condition $1$, i.e. it has a limit of $1$, and its derivative has a limit of $\lambda$. Therefore, we have just proven that if some nonzero $\alpha$ is possible, then all real values are possible, so $|\alpha|\leq 1$ is not the correct answer either.
Therefore, $\alpha=0$ must be the correct answer.
Now I know, that's not what we really want here. We'd rather actually prove that $\alpha=0$. To do that, consider the following facts:
- If $\alpha > 0$, then there exists some $M$ such that $f'(x)>\frac\alpha2$ for all $x>M$.
- $f(x)=\int_0^x f'(t) dt + f(0)$
- For any integrable $g$, we have $\int_0^x g(t) dt=\int_0^M g(t)dt + \int_M^x g(t) dt$.
- For any pair of integrable functions $f, g$, if $g(x)>h(x)$ for all $x\in [a,b]$ then $\int_a^b g(x)dx > \int_a^b h(x)dx$.