3

Upon introducing the idea of circular functions my textbook states:

We start at the point $(1,0)$ and measure an arc length $s$ along the circle. [...] Let the endpoint of this arc be at the point $(x, y)$. The circle is the unit circle - it has center at the origin and radius 1 unit (hence the name unit circle). Recall from algebra that the equation of this circle is: $x^2 + y^2 =1$

The radian measure of $\theta$ is related to the arc length $s$. For $\theta$ measured in radians, we know that $s=r\theta$. Here $r=1$, so $s$, which is measured in linear units such as inches or centimeters, is equal to $\theta$, measured in radians. Thus, the trigonometric functions of angle $\theta$ in radians found by choosing a point $(x, y)$ on the unit circle can be rewritten as functions of the arc length $s$, a real number. When interpreted this way, they are called circular functions.

enter image description here

I have several questions regarding this:

1) The text points out that the arc length, $s$ is measured in linear units while the angle measure, $\theta$, is in radians. Clearly two different units of measurement, so how could the two unit types be used interchangeably as the inputs of the trigonometric functions, where, for example, $\sin(s)= \sin(\theta)$?

2) $s=\theta$ is derived from $s=r\theta$ (formula for calculating arc length) and the fact that a unit circle has a radius of $1$, $r=1$. However, if the unit circle is not used and the radius is no longer 1, then is the arc length, $s$, still equal to the angle measure $\theta$? How?

3) Why not continue using angle measure in radians as the input for the trig. functions? Why use arc length instead?

Slecker
  • 969
  • 10
  • 29

1 Answers1

4

The radian measure of an angle is $$ \frac{\text{length of arc}}{\text{radius of circle}} $$ which is dimensionless.

A central angle of $\theta$ radians in a circle of radius $r$ will cut off an arc of length $r \theta$. The $\sin$ of that angle is independent of $r$.

In the figure the circle has radius $1$, so the radian measure of the angle is numerically equal to the arclength. But it is the radian measure that is the argument you use when computing the $\sin$.

Ethan Bolker
  • 95,224
  • 7
  • 108
  • 199
  • If the radian measure is the argument for the trig functions, then why bother using the arc length as the argument and going through the point of showing that $s = \theta$? – Slecker Mar 05 '19 at 02:58
  • 1
    You don't use the arc length, unless you happen to have or want to construct a unit circle on which to measure the arc length. I think the illustration in your book is subtly wrong. The point is $(\cos \theta, \sin \theta )$. Most students won't notice, but you read carefully enough to ask this good question. – Ethan Bolker Mar 05 '19 at 03:05
  • Thank you for your input (pun unintended), it's clarified a lot for me. Cheers! – Slecker Mar 05 '19 at 03:13