While going through David H. answer on What is $\int_0^1 \frac{\log \left(1-x^2\right) \sin ^{-1}(x)^2}{x^2} \, dx$? I have encountered a step in between I do not really understand. Within the second half of Part $3$ he has rewritten an Appellian Hypergeometric Function $F_1(a;b,b';c;x,y)$ in terms of two Gaussian Hypergeometric Functions $_2F_1(a,b;c;x)$ in the following way
$$\small F_1\left(1;1,\frac12;2;x,xz\right)~=~\frac2{x\sqrt{1-zx}}~_2F_1\left(1,\frac12;\frac32;\frac{1-z}{1-xz}\right)-\frac2x~_2F_1\left(1,\frac12;\frac32;1-z\right)$$
Relying on the general idea of Appell's Hypergeometric Function as an extension of Gauss' Hypergeometric Function I conjectured that the given identity is a particular case of a more general formula. Searching through various websites aswell as articles I was not able to find something helpful. It might be the case that I have overlooked something.
However, while searching I became more familiar with the machiney of Hypergeometric Functions in general. Thus, I have some guesses regarding the identity
- First of all I concerning the factor $2$: quite often a regularisation using Beta Functions is done within the integral representations of Hypergeometric Functions. Therefore I guess the $2$ can be represented through $B\left(\frac12,1\right)=B\left(\frac12,\frac32-\frac12\right)=2$. The arguments of this Beta Function correspond to the values of the $_2F_1$ functions.
- Secondly, it seems to me that the arguments of the latter $_2F_1$ functions correspond to the two arguments of the $F_1$ function as $$F_1(\dots;x,y)=~_2F_1\left(\dots;\frac{1-\frac yx}{1-y}\right)-~_2F_1\left(\dots;1-\frac yx\right)$$
- Last but not least, the factors infront of the $_2F_1$ functions which depend on $x,y$ might be given by $$F_1(a;b,b';c;x,y)=~x^{-b}y^{-b'}~_2F_1(\dots)-~x^{-b}~_2F_1(\dots)$$
I am still not really sure how to deduce the general formula from the given particular case since on could combine the arguments of the $F_1$ function in many ways in order to get the one from the $_2F_1$ functions. I tried to utilize the integral representations of both invoked functions but it did not really lead anywhere. The usage of the series representations seems to be pointless her but I could be proved wrong. I had no luck with the particular case either.
Could someone provide a proof for the given identity? Moreover I would be interested in the general formula which was used here and in a proof of it aswell.
Thanks in advance!