8

Lusin Theorem (as stated by Rudin):

Let $X$ be a locally compact Hausdorff space and let $μ$ be a regular Borel measure on $X$ such that $μ(K)<∞$ for every compact $K⊆X$. Suppose $f$ is a complex measurable function on $X$, $μ(A)<∞$, $f(x)=0$ if $x∈X \setminus A$, and $ϵ>0$. Then there exists a continuous complex function $g$ on $X$ with compact support such that

$μ(x:f(x)≠g(x))<ϵ$.

But I can't seem to find in the proof anywhere a use of the fact that the measure is finite for compact sets. Is the condition nessecary? Is there a counter-example?

user1337
  • 24,381
yaakov
  • 935

1 Answers1

5

It can be shown that any $\sigma$-finite regular measure on an LCH space must have $\mu(K) < \infty$ for $K$ compact. (Exercise: Prove it.) So we will have to use a measure which is not $\sigma$-finite. Modifying Giuseppe Negro's example (now deleted), let $X = \mathbb{R}$ and $\mu(A) = \infty$ for all nonempty $A$, which I think is a regular measure (rather trivially so), and take $f$ to be any discontinuous function.

Rudin's proof of Lusin contains the following line:

Fix an open set $V$ such that $A \subset V$ and $\bar{V}$ is compact. There are compact sets $K_n$ and open sets $V_n$ such that $K_n \subset T_n \subset V_n \subset V$ and $\mu(V_n - K_n) < 2^{-n} \epsilon$.

This invokes Theorem 2.17 (a) (paraphrased):

For any measurable set $E$ and $\epsilon > 0$, there exists $F$ closed and $V$ open with $F \subset E \subset V$ and $\mu(V-F) < \epsilon$.

The proof of 2.17 uses the assumption that $\mu$ is finite on compact sets in the second line, when it asserts that $\mu(K_n \cap E) < \infty$.

Also, it's easy to see that all of Rudin's quoted claims fail using the example I gave.

Alex M.
  • 35,207
Nate Eldredge
  • 97,710
  • 2
    But the conditions of the theorem state that the function has a finite-measure support, which your example does not have. Also, it is easy to prove the quoted line for finite measure sets - which is the case here. – yaakov Mar 30 '11 at 21:42
  • :-) Thank you for the credit! I don't think I quite deserved that, though. (lol) – Giuseppe Negro Mar 30 '11 at 21:43
  • 1
    @yaakov: Oh, good point. So the condition is redundant. – Nate Eldredge Mar 30 '11 at 23:36