I know that the set contains an interval (the Steinhaus theorem), but I can't use this for answer the question, maybe someone have a hint to prove that's true or a counterexample for show that's false.
Asked
Active
Viewed 600 times
2
-
3Possible duplicate of The set of differences for a set of positive Lebesgue measure – Lev Bahn Nov 12 '18 at 19:41
-
@LeB No, that's not the same question at all. – Robert Israel Nov 12 '18 at 19:51
-
Oh! sorry! my bad – Lev Bahn Nov 12 '18 at 20:03
1 Answers
8
The statement is false. Compare the results of Ciesielski, Fejzić, and Freiling: you can have a subset $A$ of a compact set of measure $0$ (which therefore is Lebesgue measurable) such that $A + A$ is non-measurable. WLOG take $A \subset [0,1]$. Let $E = A \cup (10 - A) \cup [100,101]$ which is measurable with measure $1$. Then $$(E - E) \cap [-10, -8] = A - (10-A) = -10 + (A + A)$$ and this is nonmeasurable.

Robert Israel
- 448,999