For simplicity's sake, I'm working with a 3x3 square matrix in which none of the column or row vectors is the zero vector.
I tried graphing the columns of the matrix {{1,4,-3},{2,7,-5},{3,6,-3}} (where each group of $3$ is a row) and those $3$ vectors are on the same plane. I understand why that's the case; what I don't understand is why it necessarily implies that the $3$ row vectors are also on a single plane.
I have some algebraic intuition for the 2d case. For example with vectors v = <1,2> and w = <3,6>, the fact that w = 3v means that the respective components of the two vectors are in the same proportion, and therefore the vectors x = <1,3> and y = <2,6> are also colinear.
I tried to extend that kind of logic to the 3d case but I didn't manage to because of the increased complexity. For ex in the 3x3 matrix that I used, if column vectors are u, v and w, then u = v + w. Since one vector isn't simply a scalar multiple of another as in the 2d case, I can't seem to apply the same logic of proportions kept.
I saw this question: For a square matrix, row vectors are linearly independent if and only if columns are., but it doesn't give the kind of intuition I'm looking for.