0

Is the following known (or even correct)?

Let $q = p^n$ be a prime power.

Let $f(x), g(x) \in F_q[x]$ with $f(x) = x^m + ax^r + b$ with $a,b \ne 0$ and $g(x) = x^{mt} + cx^{rt} + d$ with $c,d \ne 0$ such that $f|g$

Then $t = p^i$ for some $i \ge 0$ and $c = a^{t}, d = b^{t}$.

ie. if the ${\bf exponents}$ match up nicely, then divisibility implies that $g$ is a Frobenius style power or $f$.

Note that $f$ and $g$ being trinomials is not the important part, but only that they have the same number of terms and the corresponding exponents divide as indicated.

Note that if $t = p^i$ then $f^{t} = x^{mt} + a^{t}x^{rt} + b^{t}$ holds. I'm looking for the converse or something close to it.

Dan
  • 64

1 Answers1

1

Nope. The following mechanism producing counterexamples springs to mind.

Consider for example the irreducible polynomial $f(x)=x^2+x+1$ from $\Bbb{F}_2[x]$. Its zeros, say $\alpha$ and conjugates, are third roots of unity, and therefore satisfy the equation $\alpha^7=\alpha$. Implying that they are also zeros of $f(x^7)$. Implying that $$f(x)\mid f(x^7)=x^{14}+x^7+1.$$

Actually this divisibility relation holds in all characteristics (even zero). For exactly the same reason.


More generally, this happens to ALL irreducible trinomials over ANY finite field. The zeros of any irreducible polynomial $f(x)$ are roots of unity of some order, say $\ell$, and consequently $f(x)\mid f(x^{1+k\ell})$ for all $k$. The polynomial $f(x^{1+k\ell})$ is obviously a trinomial with the exponents matched up as prescribed. All you need to do is to select $k$ such that $1+k\ell$ is not a power of the characteristic.

Jyrki Lahtonen
  • 133,153