1

Why is it true that if $p\equiv1\pmod{4}$ then $\sqrt{p}\in\mathbb{Q}(\zeta_p)$?

Watson
  • 23,793
  • Since $p$ is prime, $2$ divides the degree of the cyclic extension $\Bbb Q(\zeta_p) / \Bbb Q$, which has then a unique quadratic subextension $K/\Bbb Q$. Since only $p$ ramifies in $K$, and has odd discriminant, one finds $K = \Bbb Q(\sqrt p)$ (the possibility $K = \Bbb Q(\sqrt{-p})$ is excluded). – Watson Nov 06 '18 at 22:14
  • @Watson: Why does only $p$ ramifies in $K$? Why does $K$ have odd discriminant? –  Nov 16 '18 at 09:50
  • if $p$ ramifies in $K$, then it ramifies in $L =\Bbb Q(\zeta_p)$, but it is a general fact that the only ramified prime in $L$ is $p$. 2) If $K$ had even discriminant, then $2$ would be ramified in $K$, but we've just seen that the only ramified prime in $K$ is $p$, which is odd.
  • – Watson Nov 16 '18 at 09:55
  • @Watson: 1) shows that the only prime possibly ramified in $K$ is $p$, but why is it impossible that it is not ramified? –  Nov 16 '18 at 11:14
  • Dear @sai, it is a theorem of Minkowski that any number field of degree $>1$ over $\Bbb Q$ has at least one ramified prime. – Watson Nov 16 '18 at 11:19
  • @Watson: How come $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{-p})$ is excluded? –  Nov 16 '18 at 11:30
  • Because $-p \equiv 3 \pmod 4$, so $\Bbb Q(\sqrt{-p})$ has even discriminant $-4p$. – Watson Nov 16 '18 at 12:44
  • @Watson: Thank you very much for your explanations, now I understand logically. But how come just one sentence in what I was reading amount to this much? And how does one come up with this proof? –  Nov 17 '18 at 02:17