Conceptually the inductive step gets $\,P(n\!+\!1)\,$ by scaling $\,P(n)\,$ by $\,\color{#c00}{7 \equiv\,1}\pmod{\!3}\,$ using CPR = Congruence Product Rule. If congruences are unknown we can preserve this arithmetical essence by using an analogous product rule for divisibility as below, where $\ m\mid n\ $ means $\,m\,$ divides $\,n.\,$
$$\qquad\qquad\qquad\!\! \begin {align}
&3\mid\ \color{#c00}{7\ \ - \,\ 1}\\
&3\mid\ \ \ 7^{\large n} -\ B\qquad\ P(n)\qquad\ [B = -2\,\ {\rm in\ OP}]\\
\Longrightarrow\ \ &3\mid\ \color{#c00}7 7^{n}\! -\color{#c00}1B\qquad P(n\!+\!1)
\end{align} $$
$\begin{align}{\bf Divisibility\ Product\ Rule}\ \ \ \
&m\mid\ a\ -\ b\qquad {\rm i.e.}\quad \ a\,\equiv\, b\\
&m\mid \ \ A\: -\: B\qquad\qquad \ A\,\equiv\, B\\
\Longrightarrow\ \ &\color{}{m\mid aA - bB}\quad \Rightarrow\quad aA\equiv bB\!\pmod{\!m}\\[.2em]
{\bf Proof}\,\ \ m\mid (\color{#0a0}{a\!-\!b})A + b(\color{#0a0}{A\!-\!B}) &\,=\, aA-bB\ \ \text{by $\,m\,$ divides $\rm\color{#0a0}{green}$ terms by hypothesis.}\end{align}$
The point of using congruences (vs. divisibilities) is that it allows us to reuse our strong intuition about operations (vs. relations), e.g. the above congruence product rule is the analog of multiplying the equations $a =b,\ A = b\,$ to get $\,aA = bB,\,$ something which is less intuitive arithmetically when expressed in divisibility language. This will be clarified when one studies ring theory - where one learns the relationship between congruences and quotient rings (here $\Bbb Z\bmod n\,\cong\, \Bbb Z/n\Bbb Z$)
You can find further discussion of these topic many prior posts.