From the following answer of the post Fourier transform of derivate
Because you are assuming that $f'\in L^1(\mathbb{R})$, then the following limits exist $$ \lim_{x\rightarrow\pm\infty}f(x)=\lim_{x\rightarrow\pm\infty}\int_{0}^{x}f'(t)dt+f(0). $$ The above limits must be $0$ because $f \in L^1(\mathbb{R})$; otherwise, for example, if $\lim_{x\rightarrow\infty}f(x)=L \ne 0$, then $|f(x)| \ge L/2$ for large enough $x$, which would contradict the absolute integrability of $f$ on $[0,\infty)$. Because these limits must be $0$, then the evaluation terms below vanish: \begin{align} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}f'(t)e^{-ist}dt & = \left.f(t)e^{-ist}\right|_{t=-\infty}^{\infty}-\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}f(t)\frac{d}{dt}e^{-ist}dt \\ & =is\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}f(t)e^{-ist}dt. \end{align}
I don't understand the part :
The above limits must be $0$ because $f \in L^1(\mathbb{R})$; otherwise, for example, if $\lim_{x\rightarrow\infty}f(x)=L \ne 0$, then $|f(x)| \ge L/2$ for large enough $x$, which would contradict the absolute integrability of $f$ on $[0,\infty)$
i.e, I don't understand what means "which contradict the absolute integrability of $f$" if one takes a limit different from $0$ ?
Let's take for example the function $f(x)=1/x +1$ : this function tends to $1$ when $x\to\infty$ : should one conclude that $f$ is not absolute integrable ?
I would like to prove with propositional logic that if I assume a limit $L$ different from $0$, then we can deduce a contradiction on absolute integrability.
For this, I would start by the definition of the limit $L\neq 0$ of $f$ when $x\to\infty$:
$\forall \epsilon > 0$,$\exists\,a$ such that $x \geqslant a \Longrightarrow f(x) \geqslant L - \epsilon$
How can I follow the reasoning to prove the contradiction with $\int_{0}^{+\infty}|f(x)|\text{d}x < +\infty$ ?
Regards