I am giving this problem to 8th grade students, and I am hoping that people can help me find elementary ways to prove this problem. I would love to find other arguments that are accessible to 8th graders, so that I can help them with their arguments. Here is one "proof" I have so far.
There is only one such prime triplet $(3,5,7)$. Either the first number is divisible by $3$, or it is not.
If the first number is divisible by $3$, then the number the first number is not prime (except the case $3,5,7$), so it is not a prime triplet.
If the first number is not divisible by $3$, then there are two cases. The remainder equals 1 or the remainder equals $2$.
If $r=1$, we have a group of 3s with 1 left over. The next prime triplet is $p+2$, so adding 2 to the remainder of 1 will create another group of 3. Therefore, $p+2$ is divisible by 3, so this is not a prime triplet.
If $r=2$, we have a group of 3s with 2 left over. The third prime triplet is $p+4$, so adding 4 to the remainder of 2 will create two more groups of 3. Therefore, $p+4$ is divisible by 3, so this is not a prime triplet.
So, in any case, one of the numbers will be divisible by 3 making $3,5,7$ the only prime triplet.