I read this related thread but it doesn't give me a satisfactory answer to the following question:
Must it be true that the order of indices in a sum is relevant? A finite sum is essentially adding up all elements in a set. Who cares it that set is ordered forwards or backwards? Consider the following examples.
Common convention tells us that
$$\sum_{n=5}^0n=0$$
even though we are essentially trying to add the elements of {$n\in[0,5]$} backwards. The validity of this becomes paramount in the following case,
$$\sum_{m=0}^n f(n-m)\ne0$$
when we make a simplifying change of variable $m=n-i$. Then, the sum becomes
$$\sum_{i=n}^0 f(i)=0, \text{by convention.}$$
Obviously nothing significant has changed with the sum when we just change a variable definition, Why, then, does the convention dictate that the value of the sum must change? It seems this particular sum convention is nonsense and should be abandoned.