Say I have a power series $\sum_{k=0}^\infty a_k z^k$ with radius of convergence $0<R<\infty$. What can be said topologically about the set $\{z\in\Bbb C\mid |z|=R\,\mbox{ and }\sum_{k=0}^\infty a_k z^k \mbox{ converges}\}$ ? Is it possible for there to be an isolated point? Is it possible that it converges for only one point in the boundary of the circle? Thanks!
-
1One more MSE question: http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/206299/what-are-the-subsets-of-the-unit-circle-that-can-be-the-points-in-which-a-power – Bartek Aug 05 '14 at 20:23
2 Answers
I believe that this problem has not been solved completely.
In 1922, Mazurkiewicz showed that every closed and every open set on the boundary is a set of convergence. This settles your particular question. (I'll think a bit about a concrete example, and edit it in if and when I find one.)
In 1948, Herzog and Piranian strengthened this to show that every $F_\sigma$ set is a set of convergence. On the other hand, Lukasenko (1978) gave an example of a $G_\delta$ set which is not a set of convergnce.
(It's not too hard to show that every convergence set has to be a $F_{\sigma\delta}$ set, this is even true for the set of points where any sequence of continuous functions converge pointwise.)
References
- Mazurkiewicz, S., Sur les séries de puissances, Fund. Math, 3 (1922), 52-58
- Herzog, F., Piranian, G., Sets of convergece of Taylor series. I., Duke Math J., 16 (1949), 529-534.
- Lukašenko, S. Ju., Sets of divergence and nonsummability for trigonometric series, Vestnik Moskov. Univ. Ser. I Mat. Mekh. 1978, no. 2, 65–70.
Further reading
It turns out that this question was posed on Math overflow with a very long and thorough reply. See also this question.
-
-
-
@Martin Thank you! That's a much better and more complete answer than mine! – mrf Jan 28 '13 at 10:04
-
Andres attributes Lukašenko's result to Körner. I left a comment pointing this out. – Martin Jan 28 '13 at 10:13
-
@Martin This question is relevant: http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/82871 I believe Körner is mostly a survey paper (I don't have access to it right now). – mrf Jan 28 '13 at 10:57
-
Thanks. Yes, Körner's essay is a survey, nicely written with very detailed proofs, but there are no references at all, only an occasional attribution of very classical results to Lusin, Kolmogorov, Hahn, etc. Here's a link to the online version (restricted access, though). The first two pages in the preview give a good impression of how the text continues. I think it would be a good idea to link to these two answers by Andres in the body of your answer to make them more prominently visible. – Martin Jan 28 '13 at 11:42
-
@Martin I learned about Lukašenko's paper in an old sci.math post by Dave Renfro. A little googling turned up this one: http://mathforum.org/kb/message.jspa?messageID=6526953 – mrf Jan 28 '13 at 14:25
-
Yes, a power series can converge on isolated points of its "circle" of convergence.
Lusin has constructed a power series $f(z)$ with the radius of convergence of 1 but $\lim_{n\to\infty} \Big|\sum^n_{k=0}a_k z^k\Big|=\infty$ for every $z\in\mathbb{S}^1$. Later, Sierpiński modified Lusin's example to create a power series which converges at $z = 1$ but diverges on all other points of the unit circle.
For positive integer $m$, let $g_m(z) = \sum_{k=0}^{m-1} z^k = \frac{1-z^m}{1-z}$ and $h_m(z) = \sum_{k=0}^{m-1} z^{mk} g_m(e^\frac{-2\pi i k}{m} z)$. $g_m(z)$ is a polynomial of degree $m-1$ and $h_m(z)$ is one with degree $m^2-1$. Lusin's $f(z)$ is defined by: $$ f(z) = \sum_{n=0}^\infty a_n z^n = \sum_{m=1}^{\infty}m^{-1/2} z^\frac{2m^3 - 3m^2+m}{6} h_m(z) $$ and Sierpiński's modification is given by: $$ g(z) = (1-z)f(z^2) = \sum_{r=0}^{\infty} (-1)^r a_{[\frac{r}{2}]} z^r $$
I have copied these examples from the book:
North-Holland Mathematics Studies (Vol 208)
Nine introductions in Complex Analysis
Sanford L. Segal
Please consult its Charter 6, Natural boundaries for more details.

- 16,361

- 122,701