Of course we are free to define what we want, and we could define a $\ast$-topological space as a pair $(X, \tau)$ satisfying the axioms of a topological space plus the stronger axiom that the intersection of any number of members of $\tau$ belongs to $\tau$.
However, this concept is not useful. For example, $\mathbb{R}$ with its usual topology (open sets are unions of open intervals) is not a $\ast$-topological space.
You probably know that topological spaces can alternatively introduced via closed sets, i.e. as pairs $(X, \alpha)$ where $\alpha$ is a collection of subsets of $X$ satisfying the following axioms:
The empty set and $X$ itself belong to $\alpha$.
Any intersection of members of $\alpha$ belongs to $\alpha$.
Any union of finitely many members of $\alpha$ belongs to $\alpha$.
Given $\alpha$, the set $\tau = \{ X \backslash A \mid A \in \alpha \}$ is a topology on $X$. Simililarly it works in the other direction.
In a $\ast$-topological space the union of any number of closed sets is a closed set. This is a very serious restriction. For example, if you want that all singletons $\{ x \}$, $x \in X$ are closed (which is the case in most topological spaces occurring in practical applicatons), then all subsets are closed which means that the space $X$ has the discrete topology (all sets are open).