2

There are topics with the same name but my question is not as abstract as in those.

My question is as follows: taken a generic definition like $x\;\mathbf{ is\; something}$ if $y$ it could be written like $x\;\mathbf{ is\; something}\Leftarrow y$ so everytime you have $y$ then you can deduce $x\;\mathbf{ is\; something}$. But if you start with $x\;\mathbf{ is\; something}$ as an axiom you could not deduce $y$ which should be deducible. Like if you have $x\;\mathbf{ is\; even}\Leftarrow x \equiv 0 \pmod{2}$ you SHOULD have $x \equiv 0 \pmod{2}$ starting by $x\;\mathbf{is\;even}$. That should be resolved if you say by saying $x\;\mathbf{is\;even}$ iff $x\equiv0\pmod{2}$ instead of if (so you would have $\Leftrightarrow$ instead of $\Leftarrow$) but I definitely feel that I'm missing something...

Can you help me? :D

Sorry for my bad English and if my question was stupid.

Mega-X
  • 29
  • 2

0 Answers0