-1

Here, $\mathbb{N}$ is the set of natural numbers. I was reading why there is no bijection from $\mathbb{N}^\mathbb{N}$ to $\mathbb{N}$, and I understood we took any subset from $\mathbb{N}^\mathbb{N}$ and proved it not bijective to $\mathbb{N}$ by Cantor's Diagonalization argument.

What am I unable to understand is, what exactly is meant by $\mathbb{N}^\mathbb{N}$?

I read somewhere that it is recognized as the space of all sequences of natural numbers. I didn't understand why? What is the meaning of that notation?

2 Answers2

1

$A^B$ is the set of all functions from $B$ to $A$. When $A=B=\mathbb{N}$, $\mathbb{N}^\mathbb{N}$ is the set of all functions $f:\mathbb{N}\to\mathbb{N}$. Any such function can be viewed as a sequence $f(1),f(2),f(3),\ldots$, so changing notation a bit with $a_n=f(n)$ we see that the set of all functions $\mathbb{N} \to \mathbb{N}$ is the set of all sequences $a_1,a_2,\ldots$ of natural numbers.

Alon Amit
  • 15,591
1

Let $k\in\mathbb{N}$. One could write an element $x\in\mathbb{N}^k$ as the $k$-tuple $$x=(a_1,\ldots,a_k),$$ which is as saying that for each $i\in\{1,\ldots,k\}$, there exists an entry $a_i\in\mathbb{N}$. Similarly, when we write $\mathbb{N}^{\mathbb{N}}$ we mean that if $x\in\mathbb{N}^{\mathbb{N}}$, then for each $i\in\mathbb{N}$ there is an entry $a_i\in\mathbb{N}$. That translates to $$x=(a_i)_{i\in\mathbb{N}},$$ which, as you have said, is a sequence of natural numbers.

amnesiac
  • 1,040