To quote from an answer I gave to one of your questions six months ago (but with new emphasis added):
As long as a number $\alpha$ is algebraic over $\mathbb{Q}$, there is a natural extension of the $2$-adic absolute value both from $\mathbb{Q}$ to $\mathbb{Q}(\alpha)$ and from $\mathbb{Q}_2$ to $\mathbb{Q}_2(\alpha)$. (EDIT: ... and up to $[\Bbb Q(\alpha):\Bbb Q]$ reasonable extensions of $|\cdot|_2$ to $\Bbb Q(\alpha)$, namely, one for each non-archimedean place of $\Bbb Q(\alpha)$ lying above $2$ ($\Leftrightarrow$ one for each irreducible factor of the $\Bbb Q$-minimal polynomial of $\alpha$ when viewed over $\Bbb Q_2$ $\Leftrightarrow$ one for each distinct prime factor in the prime factorisation of $(2)$ in the ring of integers of $\Bbb Q(\alpha)$. In the example $\alpha=\sqrt{2}$, there is only one such extension of the value, as the prime 2 totally ramifies.)
As in your example, of course the only reasonable extension of the absolute value to $\alpha = \sqrt c$ for $c \in \mathbb{Q}_2$ is $|\sqrt c| := \sqrt{|c|}$. Much more generally, an element $\alpha$ whose minimal polynomial over $\mathbb{Q}_2$ has degree $d$ is given the value $|N_{\mathbb{Q}_2(\alpha)|\mathbb{Q}_2}(\alpha)|^{1/d}$. This is treated extensively in any book on $p$-adics, local fields etc.
With basic knowledge of $p$-adic (multiplicative) absolute values $|\cdot|_p$ and (additive) valuations $v_p$, the last definition reads
$v_2(\alpha) := \frac{1}{d}v_2(N_{\mathbb{Q}_2(\alpha)|\mathbb{Q}_2}(\alpha))$
or in your extremely special case
$v_2(\sqrt{2}) = \frac{1}{2}$
which uniquely defines an extension of $v_2$ to $\Bbb Q(\sqrt2)$ (or rather to the much bigger $\Bbb Q_2(\sqrt2)$), namely, as Somos' answer also states, ,
$$\tilde{\nu}_2(a+b\sqrt{2}) = \min (\nu_2(a), \nu_2(b) + \frac{1}{2}) \qquad \text{for } \qquad a,b \in \Bbb Q \, \text{ (or } \Bbb Q_2 \text{)}.$$
What any good lecture notes, books etc. treat is in what precise sense this extension of the value/valuation is unique, how it leads to the theory of ramified and unramified extensions etc.
On a personal note, I doubt that you followed the lead in the last sentence back then, I doubt you follow it now, and I assume you will ask a similar question in six, twelve, eighteen months again.