The definition of subnet is more convoluted than expected. The idea seems to be that the definition is such that the equivalence compactness $\Leftrightarrow$ every net has a convergent subnet holds.
In here Henno Brandsma states that for the equivalence to hold we cannot define a subnet of a net $(x_i)_{i\in I}$ to be a net $(x_i)_{i\in J}$ where $J$ is cofinal in $I$. Let $(P)$ be the property that every net admits a convergent subnet in the (non-standard) sense above.
Onwards let subnet have its classical definition. Clearly in any topological space $(P)$ implies that every net has a converging subnet. So the comment implies that there are spaces that are compact but still not satisfy $(P)$.
What would one such space look like?