I am unsure if i solved those three right. would really appreciate your input to understand if I've done something wrong:
Note: $M$ is a model, $S$ is assignment, $\varphi$ is a formula.
1) if $M \vDash_S \exists x \, \varphi$ then $M \vDash _S \varphi$
2) if $M \vDash_S \varphi$ then $M \vDash_S \forall x \, \varphi$
3) if $M \vDash_S \forall x \varphi$ then $M \vDash_S \varphi$.
What I did:
1) Incorrect. If was written that $M \vDash_S \forall x \, \varphi$ then it would be correct. But if we assume that the left part is true, then there exists a variable $x$ for which it is correct, however it doesn't mean that for every $x$, $M \vDash_S \varphi$ will be true. So incorrect.
2) True. if the left part is true, then the right part is true as its a tautology under model $M$, which means that it is true for every $x$.
3) True. If it is true for every $x$, as written in the left part, I believe we can deduct that it is a tautology under Model $M$ and assignment $S$.
If there's a better way to write the proves, or if I've done a mistake, please correct me so i can learn and improve.
Thank you very much!