A user on stack exchange suggested to think of the following problem as a good way to distinguish between algebraic mindset and an analysis mindset:
a) Prove $\sqrt{2}$ is irrational by expressing it is equal to $\frac{m}{n}$ and then come up with some irreducibility argument (lowest terms). (We did this in my introduction to maths course)
b) Prove that whenever some rational $a^2 <2$, there is some other rational $b>a$, such that $b^2 <2$
I found this second way of thinking about it extremely interesting and have been messing around with inequalities like $0< a^2 -1<1$, but I think I'm completely missing the point on the second one, to be quite frank, I'm kind of lost. I do get that the point is that you will never reach $\sqrt2$ since it's a limit point of the set of integers leading up to it, but it's not contained within $\mathbb{Q}$. This is the feature that makes $\mathbb{Q}$ not closed (does not contain all of its limit points).