2

certain polynomials in $\mathbb{Z}[x]$ have the property that their evaluations at different integers all lie in a proper ideal of $\mathbb{Z}$.

for example, this is trivially true if the coefficients of the polynomial themselves lie in the same ideal.

non-trivial examples can be found as a consequence of Fermat's Little Theorem. If $p$ is prime then: $$ \forall n \in \mathbb{Z} \; n^p-n \in (p) $$ stated differently: the polynomial $x^p -x$ annihilates the finite ring $\mathbb{Z}/(p)$

my question concerns the proof (or disproof) of a generalization of this idea, which can be expressed as follows:

for each positive integer $N$ there is a polynomial of degree $N$, with all non-zero coefficients in $\{-1,1\}$, which annihilates $\mathbb{Z}/(N)$

given $N$, the relevant polynomial is defined by: $$ f_N(x) = \sum_{d|N} \mu\bigg(\frac{N}d\bigg) x^d $$ where $\mu$ denotes the Mobius function familiar from elementary number theory. When $N$ is a prime then $f_N(x)$ reduces to $x^N - x$

Now assume $N$ is quadratfrei, so that $(N)$ is a radical ideal of $\mathbb{Z}$. Let $p$ be a prime dividing $N$. For any $t \in \mathbb{Z}$ we have: $$ f_N(t) = f_{\frac{N}p}(t^p) - f_{\frac{N}p}(t) $$ and the RHS lies in $(p)$ by Fermat's Little Theorem. an example should make this clear. Take $N=30$ and $p=5$: $$\begin{align} f_{30}(t) &= t^{30} -t^{15} - t^{10} -t^6 +t^5+t^3 +t^2 -t \\ &= (t^{30} - t^{15}-t^{10} +t^5) -(t^6 -t^3-t^2+t)\\ &= ((t^6)^5-t^6) -((t^3)^5-t^3) -((t^2)^5-t^2) +(t^5-t) \end{align} $$ similar re-arrangements show that if $p$ is any prime dividing the quadratfrei $N$, then $p|f_N(t)$ for any integer $t$. Hence $N|f_N(t)$. If $N$ is not quadratfrei this last assertion does not follow, and the argument shows only that $f_N(t) \in \sqrt{(N)}$ (the radical of $(N)$).

In the general case, for a non-quadratfrei number $M$ we have $M=Nm$ where $N=\sqrt{M}$ and $m \gt 1$. So $$ f_M(t) = f_N(t^m) $$ my question is, can we prove for all $t \in \mathbb{Z}$ that $f_M(t) \in M$?

David Holden
  • 18,040
  • 1
    A description of the ideal of polynomials vanishing modulo $m$ at all integer points can be unearthed from my answer to this question (don't forget to study Bill Dubuque's answer as well). Not sure that it helps here at all. An interesting question nevertheless. – Jyrki Lahtonen Feb 21 '18 at 20:56
  • thanks Jyrki, very useful cross-reference. i can't see Bill Dubuque's name mentioned (unless he is the user referred to as "number") – David Holden Feb 21 '18 at 21:58

0 Answers0