Recently my lecture introduced a criterion for the reducibility polynomials:
Let $R$ be an UFD, $p \in R$ prime element (notice that in an UFD $p$ prime $\Leftrightarrow p$ irreducible), $f \in R[X],\,f \neq 0, p \nmid a_n$ ($f$'s leading coefficient).
$$ \varphi: R[X] \rightarrow R/(p)[X]\,\,\,\,\sum_{i=1}^{n} a_iX^i \mapsto \sum_{i=1}^{n} \bar{a_i}X^i $$
- $f$ is irreducible in Quot($R$)[X] if $\varphi(f)$ is irreducible in $R/(p)[X]$
- $f$ is irreducible in $R[X]$ if $\varphi(f)$ is irreducible in $R/(p)[X]$ and $f$ is primitive
Now I'm wondering why more requirements are necessary to show that $f$ is irreducible in $R[X]$. For me it would be more intuitive, if more requirements would be necessary to show that f is irreducible in Quot($R$)[X].
Isn't it true, that every reducible polynomial in $R[X]$ is also reducible in Quot($R$)$[X]$ and also that every irreducible polynomial in Quot($R$)[X] is also irreducible in $R[X]$? I think I misunderstand something crucial here.