$$\sin^2z+\cos^2z=1\tag a \space \forall z \in \mathbb{C}$$
$(a)\div\sin^2z$
$$1+\cot^2z={\csc^2{z}}\tag b$$
$(a)\div\cos^2z$
$$\tan^2z+1=\sec^2z\tag c$$
$(b)$ and $(c)$ are derived from $(a)$.
But where was $(a)$ originally derived from?
$$\sin^2z+\cos^2z=1\tag a \space \forall z \in \mathbb{C}$$
$(a)\div\sin^2z$
$$1+\cot^2z={\csc^2{z}}\tag b$$
$(a)\div\cos^2z$
$$\tan^2z+1=\sec^2z\tag c$$
$(b)$ and $(c)$ are derived from $(a)$.
But where was $(a)$ originally derived from?
In the real case, for acute angles use Pythagoras' Theorem. In a right angled triangle,
/|
1/ |
/ | y
/A__|
x
with angle $A$, adjacent side $x$, opposite side $y$, and hypotenuse of length $1$, we have the following trig ratios:
$$\cos A=\frac{x}{1}=x\quad\sin A=\frac{y}{1}=y,$$
so we have $$\cos^2A+\sin^2A=x^2+y^2,$$ but $x^2+y^2=1$ by Pythagoras' theorem, so that $$\sin^2A+\cos^2A=1.$$ You can adapt to obtuse angles.
Update
Since it was not initially clear you wanted $z\in\mathbb{C}$, then here is the proof in the complex case:
$$1=e^0=e^{iz-iz}=e^{iz}e^{-iz}=(\cos(z)+i\sin(z))(\cos(-z)+i\sin(-z))\\=(\cos(z)+i\sin(z))(\cos(z)-i\sin(z)),$$ which simplifies to $$\cos^2(z)-i^2\sin^2(z)=\cos^2(z)+\sin^2(z),$$ as @nbubis points out.
If you need to prove this for all $z\in\mathbb{C}$, you can use Euler's identity: $$1 = e^{-iz}e^{iz}= (\cos (-z) + i\sin (-z))(\cos z + i\sin z)=\cos^2 z + \sin^2 z.$$