First, observe that an independent-increment process depends on the fact that the sequence is defined on $R$. A Markov Chain can be defined in any set $S$. If $S \neq R$, you might have trouble to even define what independent-increment would be.
You can also consider a process in $R$ defined in the following way: $X_{t+1} = X_{t} + Z$, where $Z|(X_{t},X_{t-1},\ldots,X_{0}) \sim N(-X_{t},1)$. This an example of a process such that the increment depends only on the last step and, therefore, is not independent but the process is Markovian.
Regarding 2, I don't think I have much to add. You can always write $X_{t} = X_{t-1} + Z_{t}$. since $X_{t}$ is Markovian, $Z_{t} = f(X_{t},U_{t})$, where $U_{t}$ is independent of $(X_{t-1},X_{t-2}, \ldots, X_{0})$. I guess you have to prove that $f(x,u)$ is constant on $x$.
Regarding 2, maybe another way around is to prove that the process is increment-independent iff $Z_{t}$ is independent of $X_{t-1}$ (Under the markov process assumption)?
– madprob Dec 11 '12 at 19:04Anyway, if you are interested in a counterexample for a continuous problem, simply interpolate the points in my example ;)
– madprob Apr 20 '16 at 07:00