1

How can I prove or disprove this claim?

Since $X$ is invertible, $X$'s eigenvalue $\lambda_i \neq 0$ for all $i = 1, \cdots ,n$. However, according to Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eigendecomposition_of_a_matrix, we need $n$ linearly independent eigenvectors in addition to $X$ being square in order to say whether or not $X$ has spectral decomposition. But we know $X$ is invertible, therefore $X$ has full rank meaning that all columns of $X$ are linearly independent, but doesn't mean we have $n$ linearly independent eigenvectors? So to me, I don't know invertible and square matrix are enough to say that $X$ has a spectral decomposition.

Ada
  • 179

2 Answers2

1

Square and invertible is not enough to guarantee the existence of a spectral decomposition. The standard example is $$ X = \begin{pmatrix}1&1\\0&1\end{pmatrix} $$ which has only eigenvalue $1$ and all eigenvectors are of the form $\left(\begin{smallmatrix}a\\0\end{smallmatrix}\right)$. So there is only one linearly independent eigenvector.

Arthur
  • 199,419
  • Another example is $\begin{pmatrix}0 & 1 \ -1 & 0\end{pmatrix}$ which is invertible and has no eigenvalues over $\mathbb{R}$. – Joshhh Dec 04 '17 at 19:17
0

If $X$ is invertible, it's determinant must be non-zero. The determinant is also equal to the product of its eigenvalues. Therefore none of the eigenvalues can be zero.

Paul Aljabar
  • 1,519