10

My book states that

if $X$ is compact, then $w(X) \leq |X|$.

This leads me to wonder, is there a nice example of a (non-compact) topological space where $w(x) > |X|$ holds?

The weight of a topological space is the smallest cardinality of a basis of the topology.

theQman
  • 1,097

2 Answers2

11

The maximal weight of a space $X$ is $2^{|X|}$ and in this answer I give some examples (with proofs) of spaces that realise this maximum. E.g. a countable dense subset of $\{0,1\}^{\mathbb{R}}$ in the product topology has weight $|\mathbb{R}|$.

The bound $w(X) \le |X|$ for compact spaces follows from the equality $nw(X) =w(X)$ for (locally) compact spaces (and it also holds for metrisable spaces and orderable spaces), so many standard examples don’t work.

Henno Brandsma
  • 242,131
  • +1 - this is a better answer than mine, since it provides examples of maximal weight. (I'll leave mine up anyways though.) – Noah Schweber Nov 13 '17 at 19:32
  • Interesting. So even though the weight of the discrete topology on $X$ is $|X|$, and the weight of the anti-discrete topology on $|X|$ is 1 (I think), there are topologies that are "in between" these, yet have a larger weight than both? – theQman Nov 13 '17 at 20:11
  • @theQman by convention the weight of the anti-discrete topology is $\aleph_0$ (weight is infinite by convention). But yes, the max lies in between. – Henno Brandsma Nov 13 '17 at 20:20
  • Why is weight infinite by convention? What if the space is finite? And how is this convention implied by the definition " minimum cardinality of a basis"? 2) What do you mean by "the max lies in between"?
  • – theQman Nov 13 '17 at 20:28
  • @theQman That’s the way it’s defined (so some counting arguments go through) in “cardinal functions in topology” and its sequel, which form a basis for the theory. Finite spaces have weight $\aleph_0$ as well, but in papers that only deal with finite spaces sometimes finite cardinals are used. In that case the maximal weight is also at most $|X|$ as well, of course. Max in between refers to that the maximal weight lies between indiscrete and discrete. – Henno Brandsma Nov 13 '17 at 20:37