I'm trying to find a couple of examples — the simpler the better — of sequences $(a_n:n=1, 2, \dots)$ where you:
(i) assume the $\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty}a_n$ exists and then determine (this is the "guess" part) what that limit $L$ must be; and only afterward,
(ii) prove that, in fact, $\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty}a_n = L$ (this is the "check" part).
The kinds of example I'm looking for are those where one does not simply use standard "rules for limits" to do both steps at once, i.e. not something like $a_n = (n+1)/n$, where we would simply use $\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} (n+1)/n = \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} (1 + 1/n) = 1 + \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} (1/n) = 1 + 0 = 1$.
Possibly such examples would be defined recursively. For example,$$a_1 = 1, \, \,a_n=\frac{1}{2}\left(a_{n-1}+\frac{2}{a_{n-1}}\right).$$ In this example, if you assume the sequence converges, with limit $L$, then necessarily $L = (1/2)\left(L+2/L\right)$ whence $L = \sqrt{2}$. However, unless I'm mistaken, to prove that $\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} a_n=\sqrt{2}$ is not so easy.
Another such example where the "guess" part is easy is: $$a_1=1, \,\, a_n = \sqrt{2 + x_{n-1}},$$ but again I think the "check" part would have to proceed without exploiting the knowledge of what the guessed limit (2) must be.
For the "check" step (ii), I intend that one actually uses the knowledge from (i) of what the limit must be (having assumed that the limit exists), in order to go ahead and show that this is, in fact, the limit. Thus for (ii) I do not want to apply principles such as that an increasing sequence bounded above must converge, principles whose application would presumably be independent of what the limit must be.
Any such examples?