to avoid confusion: when I'm talking about x factorial I'm talking about the factorial extension to the real (and complex) numbers, not just the naturals. (because obviously x isn't natural)
-
Do you talk about gamma function? There are no zeroes. – Jul 31 '17 at 08:49
-
So you are basically talking about the equation $\Gamma(z+1) = 0$ ? – Zubzub Jul 31 '17 at 08:52
-
As @sigmabe says. Take a look at wikipedia to convince yourself. – drhab Jul 31 '17 at 08:54
-
There exist many extensions to the factorials. Are you sure you mean the gamma function? – mathreadler Jul 31 '17 at 09:38
-
to all of you, yes i mean the gamma function – tom sharon Jul 31 '17 at 09:52
-
Why do you think this should have solutions? What did you try to approach the question? – Did Jul 31 '17 at 09:58
-
@Did just out of curiosity – tom sharon Jul 31 '17 at 09:59
-
I suspect there are no solutions under the Gamma function due to Logarithmic Convexity. – Jul 31 '17 at 10:04
-
2@tomsharon "just out of curiosity" You might not realize it, but this comment addresses neither of the two questions in my comment. – Did Jul 31 '17 at 10:05
-
@DId "What did you try to approach the question" i approached it out of curiosity "Why do you think this should have solutions" i dont know if there are any i was just curios if there ware – tom sharon Jul 31 '17 at 10:18
-
1@tomsharon: Did's question was what you tried, not why you tried it, though. (For the record, in my opinion this doesn't look like a question where we should be asking "what have you tried", since it is exceedingly unlikely to be a homework problem). – hmakholm left over Monica Jul 31 '17 at 10:20
-
Still not answering the query. I am asking for the tries you made to solve the question, if any (and I am beginning to suspect that I know the answer to the query, alas). – Did Jul 31 '17 at 10:20
-
@HenningMakholm The thing is that one cannot "fall on" such a question without having read/heard about Gamma and the like. And about that, we know nothing. – Did Jul 31 '17 at 10:21
-
@Did i tried to find a real solution and obviously there are none, as for complex solutions i'm not sure – tom sharon Jul 31 '17 at 10:22
-
If your question is about Gamma function, it should probably be tagged ([tag:gamma-function]). – Martin Sleziak Jul 31 '17 at 12:49
3 Answers
Note that $$ \begin{align} \sum_{k=1}^{n-1}\left[\log\left(1+\frac{z}{k}\right)-\frac{z}{k}\right] &=\log\left(\frac{\Gamma(n+z)}{\Gamma(n)\Gamma(1+z)}\right)-zH_{n-1}\\ &=\log\left(\frac{\Gamma(n+z)}{\Gamma(n)\Gamma(1+z)}\right)-z\log(n)-z\gamma+O\!\left(\frac{z}{n}\right) \end{align} $$ Taking the limit as $n\to\infty$, and using Gautschi's Inequality, we get $$ \sum_{k=1}^\infty\left[\log\left(1+\frac{z}{k}\right)-\frac{z}{k}\right] =-\log(\Gamma(1+z))-z\gamma $$ Therefore, $$ \frac1{\Gamma(1+z)}=e^{z\gamma}\prod_{k=1}^\infty\left(1+\frac{z}{k}\right)e^{-\frac{z}{k}} $$ The product on the right hand side converges for all $z$ and is $0$ at the negative integers.
Thus, $\frac1{\Gamma(1+z)}$ is an entire function and $\Gamma(1+z)=z!$ is never $0$.

- 345,667
The gamma function $\Gamma(z)$ is never zero for any complex $z$. (Zero is the only complex number that is not in the range, though).
Therefore, if you let $x!$ mean $\Gamma(x+1)$ for $x\notin \mathbb Z$, then the equation $x!=0$ has no solutions either.

- 286,031
-
-
@SimplyBeautifulArt: It's basically just repeating information that was already posted as comments. – hmakholm left over Monica Aug 01 '17 at 18:13
-
$$x!=\Gamma(x+1)$$ $$\text{limit}_{n\to\infty} \Gamma(\frac{1}{2}-n)=0\qquad n=\text{positive integer}$$ Back to factorial : $$\text{limit}_{n\to\infty} (-\frac{1}{2}-n)!=0\qquad n=\text{positive integer}$$ The improperly so called "solution" of the equation $\quad x!=0\quad$ is not finite : $$x=-\frac{1}{2}-n\qquad n\to\infty$$

- 66,221
- 3
- 37
- 87