I'm guessing that you might really be interested in the following.
Lemma. If $L$ is any field, then it has at most one subfield $K$ that is isomorphic to $\Bbb{Q}(\sqrt2)$.
Proof. Unless $L$ has characteristic zero you are not going to find such a subfield, so we can assume that. Then the prime field of $L$ is isomorphic to $\Bbb{Q}$ (by a unique isomorphism). Therefore we can without loss of generality assume that $\Bbb{Q}\subseteq L$. To get to the required $K$ we need the polynomial $x^2-2$ to have zeros in $L$. For if $a^2=2$ then $K=\Bbb{Q}(a)$ works. But, $x^2-2$ is quadratic so it cannot have more than two zeros in $L$. And if $a$ is one root then $-a$ is the other.
But $\Bbb{Q}(a)=\Bbb{Q}(-a)$, so the subfield is unique (as a set). QED.
This is in sharp contrast to $\Bbb{Q}(\root3\of2)$. Adjoining a single root of $x^3-2$ does not necessarily give the others free of charge. Indeed, we have three distinct subfields of $\Bbb{C}$ that are all isomorphic to $\Bbb{Q}(\root3\of2)$.
However, if $a$ generates a cyclic cubic extension then essentially the same argument works. So for example $M=\Bbb{Q}(\cos\dfrac{2\pi}7)$ is the only subfield of $\Bbb{C}$ isomorphic to $M$. To see this let $m(x)=x^3+x^2-2x-1$ be the minimal polynomial of $2\cos(2\pi/7)$. If $m(a_1)=0$ for some $a_1\in\Bbb{C}$ then it is easy to show that $a_2=a_1^2-2$ is another. And $a_3=a_2^2-2=-a_1^2-a_1+1$ is the third. This allows us to conclude that $\Bbb{Q}(a_1)$ contains all the zeros of $m(x)$, namely $2\cos(2\pi/7), 2\cos(4\pi/7)$ and $2\cos(8\pi/7)$. Those are then necessarily $a_1,a_2,a_3$ in some order. Hence $\Bbb{Q}(a_1)=M$.
The same holds for all (finite) Galois extensions of $\Bbb{Q}$. Each and every one of them is isomorphic to a unique subfield of $\Bbb{C}$.
For such uniqueness results to work it is necessary to fix a big ambient field $L$ and work inside it. I used $L=\Bbb{C}$. Otherwise we have "incomparable" fields like the one constructed in Hagen von Eitzen's answer.
In algebra texts splitting fields are often introduced without a big ambient field. There are several reasons for this: A) The teacher doesn't need to worry about the students having seen a proof of the FTA. B) The text will soon use the "uniqueness up to isomorphism" variant of the construction of a splitting field to prove the uniqueness (up to isomorphism) of finite fields of a given cardinality, and this is a very convenient way of doing that. Observe that when splitting polynomials over $\Bbb{Z}_p$ we don't have a suitable algebraically closed ambient field available!