In my attempt to prove $\frac d{dx}\left(e^x\right)=e^x$, I arrived at the following step: $$\frac d{dx}\left(e^x\right)=e^x\lim_{h\to0}\frac{e^h-1}{h}$$ At this point, I substituted in $$e=\lim_{n\to\infty}{\left(1+\frac 1n\right)^n}$$ to arrive at $$\frac d{dx}\left(e^x\right)=e^x\lim_{h\to0}\frac{\lim_{n\to\infty}{\left(1+\frac 1n\right)^{nh}}-1}{h}$$ Then, I let $h=\frac 1n$ to get $$\frac d{dx}\left(e^x\right)=e^x\lim_{h\to0}\frac{(1+h)^{h\left(\frac 1h\right)}-1}{h}$$ at which point a lot of things simplify and the limit is clearly equal to one. My question concerns the $h=\frac 1n$ step. While I see why this might be true, I don't really have a good conceptual or mathematical grasp of why this works, or whether this is even valid at all. Can the nested limit just be removed that way and $n$ replaced, or is there something else at work here?
-
1If you can prove the double limit exists (perhaps without evaluating it), then this holds. – Simply Beautiful Art Jun 15 '17 at 23:39
-
Can you give me a counterexample where the double limit not existing might lead to an incorrect result? – DreamConspiracy Jun 16 '17 at 00:30
-
1Easy. Consider the following limit: $$\lim_{h\to0}\lim_{x\to\infty}xh$$ – Simply Beautiful Art Jun 16 '17 at 00:34
-
Ah, interesting. Can it be said at all whether this limit evaluates? As in, is there a single solution to it? – DreamConspiracy Jun 16 '17 at 01:25
-
@SimplyBeautifulArt The OP was not interchanging the limits, but rather illegitimately setting one independent parameter as a function of the other independent one. We can appeal here to the Moore-Osgood Theorem to show that we can interchange the order of limits. I've posted a solution with three ways forward. – Mark Viola Jun 16 '17 at 02:45
1 Answers
It is not legitimate to let $h=1/n$ since $h$ and $n$ are independent parameters. We can still proceed along any of the following ways forward.
METHODOLOGY $1$:
In THIS ANSWER, I showed that $\left(1+\frac xn\right)^n$ converges uniformly to $e^x$ on any bounded interval of the real line.
Therefore, the function $\frac{d}{dx}\left(1+\frac xn\right)^n=\left(1+\frac xn\right)^{n-1}$ converges uniformly to $e^x$ on any bounded interval of the real line.
Hence, $\frac{de^x}{dx}=e^x$ for all $x\in\mathbb{R}$.
METHODOLOGY $2$:
In THIS ANSWER, I showed using only the limit definition of the exponential function and Bernoulli's Inequality that the exponential function satisfies the inequalities
$$1+x\le e^x\le \frac{1}{1-x}$$
for $x<1$. Therefore, we can write for $0<h<1$
$$1\le \frac{e^h-1}h\le \frac{1}{1-h}$$
whence application of the squeeze theorem yields the coveted limit
$$\lim_{h\to 0^+} \frac{e^h-1}h=1$$
A parallel development for $h<0$ results in the same conclusion. And we are done.
METHODOLOGY $3$:
In THIS ANSWER, I discuss the Moore-Osgood Theorem, which permits the interchange of limits if one of the two limits converges pointwise and the other uniformly.
It can be shown that $\lim_{h\to 0}\frac{\left(1+\frac1n\right)^{nh}-1}{h}=n\log\left(1+\frac1n\right)$ and the convergence is uniform for $n\in \mathbb{N}$.
Hence, the Moore-Osgood Theorem guarantees that
$$\begin{align} \lim_{h\to 0}\lim_{n\to \infty}\frac{\left(1+\frac1n\right)^{nh}-1}{h}&=\lim_{n\to \infty}\lim_{h\to 0}\frac{\left(1+\frac1n\right)^{nh}-1}{h}\\\\ &=\lim_{n\to \infty} n\log\left(1+\frac1n\right)\\\\ &=1 \end{align}$$
as expected again!

- 74,685

- 179,405
-
1Very thorough +1 and I see another mention of Moore Osgood theorem. – Paramanand Singh Jun 16 '17 at 13:46
-
@ParamanandSingh Thank you Paramanand! And that Theorem is actually quite powerful. – Mark Viola Jun 16 '17 at 15:44