6

In his book, Axioms & Set Theory, Robert Andre introduces logic with this statement:

If $Q$ is true whenever $P$ is true, and $T$ is true whenever $Q$ is true, then $T$ is true whenever $P$ is true.

He renders the statement symbolically:

$$[(P \Rightarrow Q) \land (Q \Rightarrow T)] \Rightarrow T$$

How is this so? The symbols seem to say:

If $Q$ is true whenever $P$ is true, and $T$ is true whenever $Q$ is true, then $T$ is true.

It seems to me that the English statement given by Andre would be rendered

$$[(P \Rightarrow Q) \land (Q \Rightarrow T)] \Rightarrow [P \Rightarrow T]$$

What am I missing?

MathAdam
  • 3,309

1 Answers1

0

Your statement is correct since it reduces to $[P \implies T] \implies [P \implies T]$ which is a tautology(Always true),

Andre's statement however reduces to $[P \implies T] \implies T ]$ which is a false statement if both P and T are false.

As a side note this makes you right since proving logical correctness of a statement is the same as reducing it to a tautology

Sam
  • 385