Okay so I would like some clarification on a very elegant answer given by Martin Brandenburg on the following post:
Order of a product of subgroups
I am well aware of the orbit stabiliser theorem and understand the direction he wants to take with the proof. There is just $2$ steps which I think should be easy to fill in in his proof but I cannot seem to do either.
1) Why is it obvious that the action is transitive?
That is given $hk$ and $h'k'$ in $HK$ why is it true that there exists $(h^*,k^*)$ such that $(h^*,k^*)hk=h'k'$.
I tried to reverse engineer an element to show transitivity but failed.
2) Why is it easy to see the stabiliser of $1 \in HK$ is isomorphic to $H \cap K$.
Could someone explain in more detail the missing parts of the argument here so I can understand the details of this proof.
Thanks!