This is an Herstein's exercise
If an abelian group has two subgroups of order m and n, prove that it also has a subgroup of order lcm(m,n).
I've solved the exercise right before this, which is an analogue statement for elements
If an abelian group has two elements of order m and n, prove that it also has a element of order lcm(m,n).
I would like some hints (just give me half an hour) before a complete answer.
I'm trying to demonstrate that, given $H<G,K<G; m=\#H, n=\#K$ then $\#HK=r=$ lcm$(m,n)$
I know (/ I can prove) that $$\#HK={{\#H\#K}\over{\#(H\cap K)}}$$; so I would need to show, if my intuition is right this time, that $\#(H\cap K)=$ gcd$(m,n)$.
@Simon
Yes, I know that $\#H\cap K|\#H $ and $\#H\cap K|\#K $, but I don't know how to prove maximality. It sort of involves a converse of lagrange theorem, maybe. But Herstein implicitly wrote it was not needed.
@Qil
Ok, I believe I've proved what it's called Abelian groups fundamental theorem. I'll just sketch it here, so you can tell we if I'am using the concepts correctly.
Step 1 - Let $G$ be a group, and $H$ a normal subgroup. Then we can define an homomorphism to $G/H$ and consequently the isomorphism $$G\rightarrow H \times G/H.$$ Step 2 - Now, let G be an abelian group, all subgroups are normal. Let us consider $$\alpha_1=\max_G \{k:o(g)=k\} $$$$g_1\in G : o(g_1)=\alpha_1$$We know that $\alpha_1|n$ for Lagrange; we can now write, using step 1, the following isomorphism $$G\rightarrow \langle g_1\rangle \times G/\langle g_1\rangle$$ Step 3 - We repeat step two, substituting $G$ with $G/\langle g_1\rangle$ and find a non-increasing sequence $\alpha_1,\cdots,\alpha_k$ such that $n=\alpha_1\cdots\alpha_k$; each $\alpha_i$ corresponding to a cyclic group of order $\alpha_i.$
Step 4 - We know that every cyclic group of order $\beta$ has a subgroup of order $\beta_k$ iff $\beta_k | \beta$. We've obtained a decomposition of $G$ into cyclic groups of prime order.
Merging those bricks together leads us to any subgroup of order $d$ when $d|n$.
But would Herstein want us to prove this for that exercise?