Recall Question 6 of the 1988 Math Olympiad
Question 6 is as follows:
Let $a$ and $b$ be positive integers such that $ab + 1$ divides $a^2 + b^2$. Show that $$\frac{a^2+b^2}{ab+1}$$ is the square of an integer.
My proof:
Proof:
Let us denote the square of an integer by $k^2$. We have to show that $$\frac{a^2+b^2}{ab+1}=k^2$$ for some $a > 0$ and $b > 0$ where $a, b, > k \in \Bbb Z$.
Rewriting the equation:
$$a^2+b^2=k^2(ab+1)=k^2ab+k^2$$
Let $k = b$:
$$a^2+b^2=b^3a+b^2 \Rightarrow a^2=b^3a \Rightarrow a=b^3$$
To check, let's substitute these relations back in the original expression:
$$\frac{a^2+b^2}{ab+1}=\frac{(k^3)^2+(k)^2}{(k^3)(k)+1}=\frac{k^6+k^2}{k^4+1}=\frac{k^2(k^4+1)}{k^4+1}=k^2$$
Two of things I would like to know about this Olympiad Question:
- Is this proof correct?
- Is there a reliable way to check if a certain solution to a proof already exist?
Background
Every now and then I visit Youtube for educational purposes. I've been a great fan of Kurzgesagt, Numberphile, Computerphile, and other educational channels. For anyone not having heard of these channels I would greatly recommended to check them out!
Today I was watching this video on the channel of Numberphile: The World's Best Mathematician (*) - Numberphile. In this video a great mathematician Professor Tao tells about his passion for mathematics from a young age. At some point in this video it is mentioned that Tao only scored 1 out of 7 points for the infamous Question 6 from the 1988 Math Olympiad. In the next couple of frames this video shows the details of the question. At that moment I paused the video to try and solve this question by myself, with only pen and paper.
After 10 minutes or so I figured out the solution to this problem and questioned myself why the question is called infamous. I came across some solutions at this site that are, in my opinion, mindblowing in terms of length and mathematical notation, for example this solution. Then I read something about Vieta-jumping that I'm not familiar with and how it's used to solve this question (or not). A rather simple solution I came across is this one. I think the elegance and quality of a solution is greatly influenced by its length and level of simplicity in terms of notation, terminology, and construction.
As far as I did my silly online research I couldn't find a solution that was equivalent to mine. Therefore I thought it would be a good idea to share it and let other people, with a much broader understandig of existing mathematical proofs, decide if this proof is correct (and a known solution).
Let k=b ⇒ a=b^3
You can't assume that $k=b,$, or that $a=b^3,$. – dxiv Mar 14 '17 at 18:13