Let $A$ be a ring, and let $a \in A$. Can the prime ideals of $A_a$ be identified with those prime ideals of $A$ which do not contain $a$?
Can the prime ideals of $A_a$ be identified with those prime ideals of $A$ which do not contain $a$?
-
If by $A_a$ you mean the localization of $A$ at the multiplicatively closed set ${1,a,a^2,\dots}$, then yes that is true. – Ken Duna Feb 22 '17 at 18:36
-
The "multiplicatively closed set" is really closed if a is not nilpotent... – DonAntonio Feb 22 '17 at 19:19
1 Answers
Can the prime ideals of $A_a$ be identified with those prime ideals of $A$ which do not contain $a$ ?
Yes. In general, if we consider the natural homomorphism $\phi \colon A\rightarrow S^{-1}A$ given by $a\mapsto \frac{a}{1}$, then for ideals $I$ of $A$ and $\mathscr{I}$ of $S^{-1}A$, $I^e=\langle \phi(I)\rangle$ is an ideal of $S^{-1}A$ called the extension of $I$, and $\mathscr{I}^c=\phi^{-1}(\mathscr{I})$ is an ideal of $A$ called the contraction of $\mathscr{I}$
We have the following:
Proposition: Let the situation be as in the previous paragraph. Then there exits a bijective map $\Phi$ between the sets $\mathscr{A}=\{P\in \text{Spec}(A): P\cap S=\emptyset\}$ and $\mathscr{B}=\text{Spec}(S^{-1}A)$ given by $$\Phi\colon \mathscr{A}\rightarrow \mathscr{B}$$ $$\;\;\;\;\;\;P\mapsto P^e.$$
Proof: This is the corollary of theorem 5.32 given in Sharp's "Steps in Commutative Algebra". $\blacksquare$
On the other hand the set $S=\{1, a, a^2,\ldots\}$ is a multiplicative closed subset of $A$. This means by the above proposition that the prime ideals of $S^{-1}A=A_a$ can be identified, by the bijection, with the prime ideals of $A$ such that are disjoint with $S$, so in particular those prime ideals do not contain $a$.
- 6,119