I've been asked by a younger student about a certain claim he had on a classification of topological subsets of $\Bbb R$. The overall idea was a bit fuzzy, but in hindsight it revolved around taking the $\sigma$-algebra generated by six (Borel) subsets + translations. I successfully (and, I hope, instructively) argumented against it. However, this led me to the question:
Could I just cut it short and fancy with a cardinality argument? Specifically, if $\sim$ is the homeomorphism equivalence on $\mathcal P(\Bbb R)$, is $\operatorname{card}\left(\mathcal P(\Bbb R)/\sim\right)>\beth_1$ ?
Intuitively, I'd say yes, because, "come on, there are $\beth_2$ nasty non-Borel sets". And, "at chit-chat level, homeomorphisms $(a,b)\to(c,d)$ are monotone functions". However, this is neither a proof nor a sufficient reason for my question to even be decidable in ZFC.
In fact, on the topic I found this weaker fact: "closed subsets up to homeomorphism are exactly $\beth_1$".
Thank you for links and/or answers.