I'm currently just watching an MIT lecture about differentiating exps and logs and it mentions that $a_k = (1+\frac{1}{k})^k = e.$
I've seen the proof and "understand" that $\lim_{k \to \infty} \ln(a_k) = 1$ s0 the limit of $a_k = e$.
The problem is when I read $e = \lim_{k \to \infty} (1+\frac{1}{k})^k$, it looks like it says $e = 1$ because I read it as $e = (1+(0))^\infty = 1$, and I'm having a hard time working out where the confusion is.
Thanks.