This question has been asked before here, but no one really dealt with the problem, and just critiqued the user's method, which seems to have been what the poster wanted. I'm looking for the full solution. In other words, is my full answer correct? If not, what should the changes be? I can find small details all over the place on Math.SE but for my own confidence (and reference), I would be very happy to have the full solution here. Perhaps others will benefit, too.
My answer seems too easy to be correct, and I am suspicious that the Monotone and/or Dominated convergence theorems don't make an appearance in my solution. We are in Royden's "Real Analysis", page 84, question 19. The question states:
"For a number $\alpha$, define $f(x)=x^\alpha$ for $0<x\leq 1$ and $f(0)=0$. Compute $\int\limits_{0}^{1}f.$"
Now, for $\alpha\geq0$, the problem is easy, as the function is Riemann integrable, and we obtain $\frac{1}{\alpha+1}$. But what about $\alpha<0$? It seems that the three cases are then $-1<\alpha<0$, $\alpha=-1$, and $\alpha<-1$. In the second, we obtain:
$$-\lim\limits_{\varepsilon\to0^+}\ln\varepsilon=\infty.$$
In the last, we obtain:
$$\frac{1}{\alpha+1}+\lim\limits_{\varepsilon\to0^+}\frac{\varepsilon^{\alpha+1}}{\alpha+1}=\infty,$$ since $\alpha+1<0$.
In the first, we obtain: $$\frac{1}{\alpha+1}+\lim\limits_{\varepsilon\to0^+}\frac{\varepsilon^{\alpha+1}}{\alpha+1}=\frac{1}{\alpha+1},$$ since $\alpha+1>0$.
So, is my answer correct when I say $\int\limits_{0}^{1}f=\frac{1}{1+\alpha}$ for $\alpha>-1$ and $\int\limits_{0}^{1}f=\infty$ otherwise?
Is the whole point of the problem that $x^\alpha$ is not Lebesgue integrable for $\alpha<-1$?