It's not a complete answer but I think is useful for proofing this question. In fact, I got the following method from this post.
We can rewrite the question as follows
$$S=n^2\,F_1^2+ {(n-1)}^2\,F_2^2+\cdots+2^2\,F_{n-1}^2+F_n^2$$
where $F_n$ is the $n$th term of Fibonacci number and $n$ is a natural number. Suppose that
$$
\left\{
\begin{array}{ccc}
U=n\,F_1^2+ {(n-1)}\,F_2^2+\cdots+2\,F_{n-1}^2+F_n^2&&\, ,\\
\\
V_i=i\, F_{n-i+1}^2+(i-1)\, F_{n-i+2}^2+\cdots+ 2\, F_{n-1}^2+F_n^2&&\, .
\end{array}
\right.
$$
It is easy to see that
$$
S=\sum_{i=0}^{n-1}\, (U-V_i)
$$
Notice that $V_0=0$. So, the values of $S$ is as follows
$$
S=n\,U-\sum_{i=0}^{n-1}\, V_i
$$
In continue, we obtain the values of the $U$ with the same strategy as shown
$$
\left\{
\begin{array}{ccc}
W=F_1^2+ F_2^2+\cdots+F_{n-1}^2+F_n^2&&\, ,\\
\\
Z_i= F_{n-i+1}^2+ F_{n-i+2}^2+\cdots+ F_{n-1}^2+F_n^2&&\, .
\end{array}
\right.
$$
That we can see
$$
U=\sum_{i=0}^{n-1}\, (W-Z_i)
$$
That results that
$$
U=n\,W-\sum_{i=0}^{n-1}\, Z_i=n\,W-\sum_{i=0}^{n-1}\, (W-(F_1^2+ F_2^2+\cdots+F_{n-i}^2))
$$
$$
U=\sum_{i=0}^{n-1}\, (F_1^2+ F_2^2+\cdots+F_{n-i}^2)=\sum_{i=0}^{n-1}\,F_{n-i}\,F_{n-i+1}=
\sum_{i=2}^{n+1}\,F_{i-1}\,F_{i}
$$
The last relation is based on this fact that $\sum_{i=1}^{n}\,F_i^2=F_n\,F_{n+1}$. By using relations $40$ and $42$
of this book, we have
\begin{eqnarray}
\sum_{i=1}^{2n}\, F_i\,F_{i-1}=F_{2n}^2 &\quad , \quad& \sum_{i=1}^{2n+1}\, F_i\,F_{i-1}=F_{2n+1}^2-1
\end{eqnarray}
For calculating $V_i$, we have the same method as follows
$$
\left\{
\begin{array}{ccc}
A=F_{n-i+1}^2+ F_{n-i+2}^2+\cdots+F_{n-1}^2+F_n^2&&\, ,\\
\\
B_j= F_{n-j+1}^2+ F_{n-j+2}^2+\cdots+ F_{n-1}^2+F_n^2&&\, .
\end{array}
\right.
$$
that we can see the following relation
$$
V_i=\sum_{j=0}^{i-1}\, (A-B_j)
$$
But obtaining $V_i$ is a bit complicated. Maybe it is clear why almost proofs in the Fibonacci coding and other recursive relations is
based on induction. Proofing with the direct method is so difficult. I hope this incomplete answer be useful for you.