The tricky part of the problem (not sure if it's inadvertent or by design) is the statement:
one egg is found to be good.
How is it found to be good? The question states that the two eggs are chosen together, and one egg is found to be good. This might rule out all the interpretations that consider a first egg and a second egg, but it is still vague. Making it specific changes the nature of the problem and the final answer. I see at least three interpretations:
- We choose one specific egg out of the two eggs and we find it good. For example, if the eggs are placed side by side, we choose the leftmost. Or we choose the one with the darker colour (assuming that colour is independent of the egg being rotten). Any way/rule to chose the egg that is decided a priori and is independent of the egg being rotten, will do. We test the chosen egg and we find it good. We are then asked what is the probability of the other egg being good.
- We do not test any egg, but instead we are told that one of the two eggs is good. We are then asked what is the probability of the other egg being good.
- We choose one of the two eggs at random, we test it and we find it good. We are then asked what is the probability of the other egg being good.
Using the first interpretation we can simply say that since one egg is tested and known to be good we can get it out of our pool of eggs and we are left with 9 remaining eggs 6 of which are good. Hence the probability that the non-tested egg is good is $\frac69 = \frac23$
The second interpretation is a different scenario. We do not know that a specific egg is good. We rather know that one of the two chosen eggs is good. So we know that we have either of these 3 possibilities: GG, BG, GB. If we were to calculate the probabilities of these events, under no conditions, we would find:
$$P(GG) = \frac7{10}\cdot \frac69 = \frac{42}{90}\\
P(BG) = \frac3{10}\cdot \frac79 = \frac{21}{90}\\
P(GB) = \frac7{10}\cdot \frac39 = \frac{21}{90}\\
$$
So we notice that $P(GG) = P(BG) +P(GB)$. So it is equally probable to get 2 good eggs out of 2 eggs and getting one good egg out of 2 eggs. Now if we include the condition that the pair of eggs cannot be BB (because we know at least one is good) then the two events (one G or both G) are still equiprobable, and since they are the only possible events, each have probability $\frac12$
This interpretation is a variation of the boy-girl paradox. If I had to guess, I'd say that the problem probably wants to describe this situation. It just doesn't do a very careful job with the description.
The third interpretation yields the same results as the first one, but it's good to keep it distinct since in slightly different scenarios it can yield different results.