1

Let $p$ be a prime, and $a$ and $b$ two integers, such that $p\not|$ $a$ and $p\not|$ $b$.

It can be possible that $p$ $|$ $ab$ ?

ervx
  • 12,208
penguina
  • 663

4 Answers4

1

Hint: The contrapositive of

$(p|ab) \Rightarrow (p|a$ or $p|b)$

answers your question.

Rodrigo Dias
  • 4,310
  • 1
  • 12
  • 29
  • Right... It's like proving $x \implies y$ by assuming $\neg y \implies \neg x$... But the latter is not given in the question, so you still need to prove it. With your method, we could just as well prove that every integer is a multiple of $5$, by assuming that if a number is not a multiple of $5$ then it is not an integer. – barak manos Dec 14 '16 at 16:24
  • It's just the definition of prime element. Given a ring $R$ and an element $x\in R$, we say that $x$ is an prime element iff $x|ab \Rightarrow x|a$ or $x|b$ for $a,b\in R$. – Rodrigo Dias Dec 14 '16 at 16:29
1

Hint. Recall that a prime $p$ divides an integer $a$ iff $p$ is in the integer factorization (which is unique) of $a$. If you know the integer factorizations of $a$ and $b$, what is the integer factorization of their product? What may we conclude?

Robert Z
  • 145,942
0

No, it is not possible. If $p\not|a$ and $p\not|b$ then $p$ is not in prime factorisation of $a$ and $b$. Hence, $p$ is not in prime factorisation of $ab$

0

In $\mathbb{N}$ we have a unique factorization, it means $a=p_1^{n_1}...p_k^{n_k}$. So if $p$ doesn't appear in factorization of a or b, it means it doesn't appear in $ab$.

  • Side note: for the specific question at hand, the multiplicity of each prime factor (i.e., $n_1,\dots,n_k$) is not important. – barak manos Dec 14 '16 at 16:33