I want to know what values of x are so that $(-2)^x = 4$
If this equation is true, why $\log_{-2}{4}$ is undefined in $\mathbb{R}$?
Asked
Active
Viewed 43 times
2

ABE_Mark45
- 27
-
Check this out:http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/690024/why-must-the-base-of-a-logarithm-be-a-positive-real-number-not-equal-to-1 – AxiomaticApproach Dec 03 '16 at 21:02
3 Answers
0
Multiply by $-1$ the left term and take logarithms:
$\log_{2}(2^x) = \log_{2}(4) \Rightarrow x\log_{2}(2) = 2$
$x = 2$

AlgorithmsX
- 4,560

kub0x
- 2,117
- 1
- 15
- 25
0
$\log_{-2}4=\frac{\ln4}{\ln(-2)}$, which leaves you with $\ln(-2)$, which is undefined in the real numbers.

AlgorithmsX
- 4,560
-
but if we use the definition that $(-2)^x=4$, I think that x would be 2. In that case, it's defined. – ABE_Mark45 Dec 03 '16 at 21:19
0
Consider the following:
Let $x=log_{-3}(27)$. Then, by definition $(-3)^x = 27$. This, however would lead to a contradiction, since $(-3)^3 = -27$. In that case, our function would not have a solution, which means it is not defined for the basis $-3$. Just because it works out for some special cases does not make it well defined.

AxiomaticApproach
- 1,146