3

I am trying to prove this claim, which seems true to me, in the process of trying to prove that $p^{n-1}$ divides ${p^{n-1} \choose k}$. Besides the conditions stated in the title, I have already proven that $p^{n-1}$ is strictly larger than $k$.

This has been my final obstacle. It is simple enough with just $p$, but the fact that $p^{n-1}$ is not prime for $n>2$ has made it difficult for me. I'd appreciate any insight.

CuriousKid7
  • 4,134

3 Answers3

2

You need to use the Fundamental Theorem of arithmetic :

Every natural number greater that $1$ can be written as a product of prime numbers in a unique way (up to order).

In particular, when writing $$k!=1\cdot 2\cdots k,$$ if $p^{n-1}|k!$, then the product must contain at least $n-1$ factor $p$.

Now the number of times $p$ appears in $k!$ can be computed by the following formula : $$\left\lfloor \frac{k}{p}\right \rfloor + \left\lfloor \frac{k}{p^2}\right\rfloor +\dots +\left\lfloor \frac{k}{p^{n-2}}\right\rfloor .$$

For a justification of this, see this question (and notice that I can end the sum at $\left\lfloor \frac{k}{p^{n-2}}\right\rfloor$ because $k<p^{n-1}$).

Thus the number of factor $p$ in $k!$ is less than $$\frac{k}{p}+\dots +\frac{k}{p^{n-2}}=\frac{k}{p}\left(1+\dots \frac{1}{p^{n-3}}\right) =\frac{k}{p}\cdot \dfrac{1-\frac{1}{p^{n-2}}}{1-\frac{1}{p}}\leq \frac{k}{p-1}\leq \frac{k}{2}<k\leq n-1.$$

Arnaud D.
  • 20,884
  • Thank you very much. It may be obvious, but would you mind explaining why the fact that p is prime implies this? Is there a general divisibility fact that you're using? – CuriousKid7 Oct 09 '16 at 11:15
  • @CuriousKid Non-primes divide factorials more times than primes do, relative to their size. For instance, given some $n$, $35$ divides $n!$ as many times as $7$ does, while $31$ and $37$ divides $n!$ a lot fewer times. Specifically, $35!$ is divisible by $35^5$, but only $31^1$ and not at all by $37$. This can, of course, be made more strict and formal, but that's the idea. – Arthur Oct 09 '16 at 11:26
  • @Arnaud I understand that it must contain at least n-1 factors of p, but I don't understand how this implies your statement in italics. – CuriousKid7 Oct 09 '16 at 11:42
  • 1
    @CuriousKid7 It didn't, the question was more complicated than I thought, but it's corrected now. – Arnaud D. Oct 09 '16 at 12:19
2

The highest multiplicity with which $p$ divides $k!$ is (this sum is of course only formally infinite) $$\sum_{j\ge 1} \left\lfloor\frac{k}{p^j} \right\rfloor.$$ To see this note that there are $\lfloor\frac{k}{p} \rfloor$ multiples of $p$ less than or equal to $k$, and $\lfloor\frac{k}{p^2} \rfloor$ multiples of $p^2$ etc. Note that the count is good as multiples of $p$ are counted once, while multiples of $p^2$ are counted twice etc.

Thus you are left with showing that $$\sum_{j\ge 1} \left \lfloor\frac{k}{p^j}\right \rfloor < k$$ Now $\sum_{j\ge 1} \left \lfloor\frac{k}{p^j}\right \rfloor \le \sum_{j\ge 1} \frac{k}{p^j} = k\sum_{j\ge 1} \frac{1}{p^j} = k \frac{1/p}{1-1/p}= k \frac{1}{p-1},$ which is at most $k/2$ for $p$ odd prime, and thus less than $k$.

quid
  • 42,135
1

One can try the following approach, which I use to prove the first Sylow theorem: let us write the binomial coefficient as

$$\binom{p^{n-1}}{k}=\frac{p^{n-1}(p^{n-1}-1)\cdot\ldots\cdot\overbrace{(p^{n-1}-(p^{n-1}-k-1))}^{=k+1}}{1\cdot2\cdot3\cdot\ldots\cdots (p^{n-1}-k)}$$

Now, we have

Lemma: for some power $\;0\le r\le n-1\;$ of $\;p\;$ and for all $\;0\le j\le k\;$, we have that $\;p^r\,\mid (p^n-j)\iff p^r\,\mid\,j\;$

Proof: Almost trivial. Try it.

Thus, we get that there's cancelation of $\;p^r\;$ every time this power of $\;p\;$ divides some factor in the numerator...or in the denominator, of course, and thus $\;p^{n-1}\;$ remains uncancelled. The problem's solved once one remembers any binomial coefficient is always an integer.

DonAntonio
  • 211,718
  • 17
  • 136
  • 287