I am following this answer by Asaf to a question, whether every set has a group structure. The main part is the following:
To prove that "every set can be made into a group $\Rightarrow$ Axiom of choice"
- Given an infinite set $X$ we define $H(X)$ to be the least ordinal $\alpha$ that there is no injection $g:\alpha\to X$ (this is known as the Hartog number of $X$)
- If $X$ can be injected into $H(X)$ then $X$ can be well ordered, since being injected into an ordinal means that $X$ inherits a well order.
- Using the assumption that every set can be given a group structure we give a group structure to $X\cup H(X)$, and from this we deduce that there exists an injection from $X$ into $H(X)$.
- Therefore if every set can be given a group structure, every set can be well ordered and therefore the axiom of choice holds.
With this (part o answer), I have a very simple question, which came to me while considering necessaties of the objects used in the arguments.
What is the necessity of taking "$H(X)$, least ordinal etc", in the arguments?
I mean, can we take simply $\mathcal{P}(X)$, the power set of $X$, instead of these objects "$H(X)$, least ordinal " in the arguments, and carry proof?