11

I have this equation:

$$f(x)=\tan(x)$$

I found the vertical asymptotes to be:

$$x=\frac{\pi}{2}k$$

What is the proper notation for that k is equal to every odd number integer(negative,positive, and zero)?

$$k\in\mathbb{Z}$$ is for every integer, but is there such a symbol for every odd number integer?

Natural numbers are positive, and sometimes zero counting numbers, my question is about integers not natural numbers.

Sigma6RPU
  • 611
  • 1
    the vertical asymptotes are the zeros of the function $\cos(x)$ – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner Sep 04 '16 at 15:52
  • 3
    "the vertical asymptotes are the zeros of the function cos(x)"... which are $\pi/2(2k + 1)$... I don't at all see the point of this comment. – fleablood Sep 04 '16 at 15:54
  • 7
    Sidenote; where writing math you don't have to use fancy symbols for everything. There is nothing wrong (and imo it should be encouraged) to use words instead wherever possible. – Winther Sep 04 '16 at 16:03
  • @Winther I was running out space on my AP Calculus Summer assignment, that is way all these questions are popping up. – Sigma6RPU Sep 04 '16 at 16:05
  • 3
    You could simply write $k\rm~odd$, also – Akiva Weinberger Sep 04 '16 at 16:25
  • 1
    @Winther One of the most remarkable things in the history of mathematics is that we have stopped using words for everything. Having convenient notation is very important. Writing has its advantages (I prefer "for all" to $\forall$, for example), but, nevertheless, in my opinion we do need simple notation for the set of odd and even integers. $\mathbb{Z}_{2k + 1}$ is my proposal. Ahmed's idea is great as well. – MathematicsStudent1122 Sep 04 '16 at 19:23
  • 1
    @Mathematics The truth is there's a continuum between writing everything completely in symbolic logic and not even using a plus sign. Use standard notation all you like, no one will argue. Beyond that, if humans are reading it, it's better to err on the side of words. – Matt Samuel Sep 04 '16 at 21:58
  • $\mathbb Z_{2k+1}$ is not a good choice since it might represent the group $\mathbb Z/(2k+1)\mathbb Z$. –  Sep 05 '16 at 20:45
  • And let's admit that we do not have a universal agreed notation on the set of odd integers. All the answers below are not clearer/shorter than the english one. –  Sep 05 '16 at 20:47
  • where come all this upvotes from?? – tired Sep 12 '16 at 12:11
  • @tired I came up with 7 different accounts, and got enough reputation to up vote myself clearly? Good question idk where anybody wanna comment why they upvoted – Sigma6RPU Sep 13 '16 at 01:38

6 Answers6

16

they are $$(2k+1)\cdot \frac{\pi}{2}$$ with $$k \in \mathbb{Z}$$

  • 2
    Thanks that deserves to be a high school math hack. – Sigma6RPU Sep 04 '16 at 15:57
  • 13
    @Sigma6RPU What's a "high school math hack"? – JiK Sep 04 '16 at 16:38
  • @JiK Anything that makes something complex, expressed in a simple elegant form. – Sigma6RPU Sep 04 '16 at 20:07
  • 4
    @Sigma6RPU I would venture to say that every serious mathematician in every field of mathematics strives to express complex things in simple, elegant forms. That being the case, it does not seem very fitting to describe the natural, commonplace behavior of every mathematician as "[high school math hacking.]" I would have thought any hacking that a high school student would do would be associated with something negative. Like expressing something simple in a complicated way or something. But if it strikes you as positive, maybe you agree and it's just a difference in interpretation. – rschwieb Sep 06 '16 at 19:40
11

You can go with $2\mathbb Z +1$

Asinomás
  • 105,651
8

As long as we're considering alternatives, you could always write $$k\equiv 1\pmod 2$$

Matt Samuel
  • 58,164
6

Usually people write:

$$\frac{\pi}{2}(2k+1), k \in \mathbb{Z}$$

Sometimes people would use $\mathbb{O}$ for the set of all odd integers, but because it is not so standard they will tell you ahead of time:

$$\mathbb{O}=\{ 2n+1 : n \in \mathbb{Z}\}$$

So then, after defining $\mathbb{O}$, you would say:

$$\frac{\pi}{2}k, k \in \mathbb{O}$$

Get used the $\in$, it simply means "is a member of" some set.

3

Alternatively, you could write

$$x = \frac{\pi}{2}k \quad , \quad k = \pm1, \pm3, \pm5 \dots$$

andrepd
  • 433
1

You could do $x \epsilon \pi \mathbb{Z} / 2 \pi \mathbb{Z}$, without resorting to $k$.

Asinomás
  • 105,651
user3146
  • 685