fiddling with small $k.$ Take $x = \Sigma u_j, \; \; y = \Sigma u_j^3.$
CONCLUSION: for $k \geq 2,$
$$ \color{blue}{ y = \frac{x^2 ((k-2) x + 3)}{k+1},} $$
while $\color{blue}{x \equiv 0,1 \pmod {k+1}}.$
When $k=2,$ $$ y = x^2. $$ This comes up pretty often, the sum of the consecutive cubes (starting with $1$) is the square of the sum of the consecutive numbers.
When $k=3,$ $$ y = \frac{x^2 (x + 3)}{4}. $$
For this one, you need to know that $x \equiv 0,1 \pmod 4.$
This already suggests that $k=4$ gives $y = a x^4 + b x^3 + c x^2 + d x,$ with rational coefficients, and some restrictions on $x$ that make $y$ an integer. If true, the coefficients can be found by taking four $x$ points, then making and inverting a certain four by four rational matrix. NOPE, not that much effort required. Stays cubic, a three by three matrix would have been enough...
Not quite what I expected: for $k=4,$
$$ y = \frac{x^2 (2 x + 3)}{5}, $$
while $x \equiv 0,1 \pmod 5.$
For $k=5,$
$$ y = \frac{x^2 (3 x + 3)}{6}, $$
while $x \equiv 0,1 \pmod 6.$
For $k=6,$
$$ y = \frac{x^2 (4 x + 3)}{7}, $$
while $x \equiv 0,1 \pmod 7.$
Apparently, for $k \geq 2,$
$$ \color{red}{ y = \frac{x^2 ((k-2) x + 3)}{k+1},} $$
while $x \equiv 0,1 \pmod {k+1}.$
Recall $x = \Sigma u_j, \; \; y = \Sigma u_j^3.$