Below, for variety, is a purely equational proof, presented in great detail. Below we use the notation $\,[\![a]\!] = \color{#c00}{j\,[\![b]\!]} + k\,[\![c]\!]\,$ to denotes that the current equation is numbered $\,a,\,$ and that it was derived as $\,\color{#c00}j\,$ times equation $\,\color{#c00}b\,$ plus $\,k\,$ times equation $\,c.\,$ Here the method is more work than ad-hoc methods, but it will often be simpler and more straightforward in more complicated problems.
Lemma $\ (12n\!-\!6,10n\!-\!3) = (n,3).\, $ Proof $ $ We work mod the gcd $\, d = (12n\!-\!6,\, 10n\!-\!3).\,$ Starting from the given congruences $\,12n\equiv 6\,$ and $\,10n\equiv 3\,$ we derive further congruences by elimination, aiming to decrease the coefficients as much as possible. This yields the following
$$\begin{eqnarray} 12n &&\equiv 6\quad &&[\![1]\!]\\ 10n &&\equiv 3 &&
[\![2]\!]\\ 2n&&\equiv 3 && [\![3]\!] = \ \ [\![1]\!]-[\![2]\!]\\
8n&&\equiv 0 && [\![4]\!] = 2[\![2]\!]-[\![1]\!]\\ 12&&\equiv 0 &&
[\![5]\!] = 4[\![3]\!]-[\![4]\!]\\ 6 &&\equiv 0 && [\![6]\!] = \ \
[\![1]\!]-[\![5]\!]n\\ 2n&&\equiv 0 && [\![7]\!]= \ \
[\![4]\!]-[\![6]\!]n\\ 3 &&\equiv 0 && [\![8]\!] = \ \
[\![3]\!]-[\![7]\!]\\ n &&\equiv 0 && [\![9]\!] = n[\![8]\!]-[\![7]\!]
\end{eqnarray}\qquad$$
Thus $\,d\mid n,3\,$ so $\,d\mid (n,3).\,$ Conversely $\,\bar d\!:=(n,3)\mid n,3\,$ so $\,\bar d\mid 12n\!-\!6,\, 10n\!-\!3,\,$ so $\,\bar d\mid d .$ Hence, since $\,\bar d\mid d\mid \bar d\,$ we deduce $\,d = \bar d = (n,3)$.
Remark $\ $ The point is that we have converted the problem from calculation with divisibility relations to simpler calculation with arithmetical operations (here modular arithmetic, i.e. in the ring $\,\Bbb Z/n = \Bbb Z\ $ mod $\,n).$ Generally, we have much better intuition on the latter due to experience with integer arithmetic. Further, we can exploit any innate algebraic structure in the latter algebraic formulation, e.g. linear algebra (or module theory), e.g. Gaussian elimination, Hermite-Smith normal forms, Grobner bases, etc (such algebraic structure would be difficult if not impossible to elicit via divisibility calculus).