There's no immediate relationship, no. The largest (in absolute value) eigenvalue of the product is no larger than the product of the largest eigenvalues, and the smallest eigenvalue of the product is no smaller then the product of the smallest.
Take any unit vector $u$ in the plane, and let $u'$ be 90 degrees counterclockwise from $u$. And let $Q$ be the matrix whose rows are $u$ and $u'$. Then for any diagonal matrix $D$, $Q^t D Q$ represents stretching along $u$ by $d_1$ and along $u'$ by $d_2$ (where these are the diagonal entries of $D$). Hold that thought.
For $u_1 = e_1$ and $(d_1, d_2) = (1, 4)$, for instance, we get a matrix $M$ that's just diagonal, with $1$ and $4$ on the diagonal. If $u$ is a unit vector in the $45$-degree direction, we get something else, but again with eigenvalues $1$ and $4$. For each possible angle $\theta$, let
$$
M_\theta = Q^t \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 4 \end{bmatrix}Q
$$
where $Q$ is the the matrix made from $u$ and $u'$, and $u$ is the vector
$$
\begin{bmatrix}
\cos u \\
\sin u
\end{bmatrix}.
$$
So $M_\theta$ has eigenvalues $1$ and $4$. Let
$$
S = \begin{bmatrix} 2 & 0 \\ 0 & 3 \end{bmatrix}
$$
Then for $\theta = 0$, we have $SM_\theta$ is a diagonal matrix with eigenvalues 2 and 12, the product of smallest and product of largest eigenvalues. But for $\theta = \pi/2$, the product has eigenvalues $8 = 2 \cdot 4$ and $3 = 1 \cdot 3$, the "middle" two products of the eigenvalues of the two original matrices. For intermediate values of $\theta$, you get other possible eigenvalues. This shows that the eigenvalues of the product can range all the way from the smallest possible (the product two smallest evals of the factors) to the largest possible.
Of course, the PRODUCT of the eigenvalues of $SM$ is the products of those of $S$ with those of $M$, by determinants. So that's another samll constraint on them.