2

Let $A$ be a unital abelian $C^*$-subalgebra of $B(H)$ (with the same unit as that of $B(H)$), and assume there exists a vector $\xi \in H$ which is cyclic for $A$ (that is, $\{a\xi | a\in A \}$ is dense in $H$), then $A'$ is abelian as well.

First, I've proved a general lemma:
Suppose $A$ is a unital $C^*$-algebra of $B(H)$ containing $1$. $\xi \in H$ is a cyclic vector for $A$ if and only if $\xi$ is separating for $A'$ (Here we don't need $A$ to be abelian).

Now, in order to show $\forall a,b\in A'$ , $ab=ba$, it suffices to show $ab\xi=ba\xi$ (as $\xi$ is cyclic for $A$ (unital) and therefore separating for $A'$.
My attempt: Let $\epsilon >0$. There exist $c,d\in A$ s.t. $||b\xi-c\xi||<\epsilon$ and $||d\xi-a\xi||<\epsilon$.
1) $||ab\xi-ac\xi||\leq ||a||||b\xi-c\xi||<\epsilon||a||$
2) $||ba\xi-bd\xi||\leq||b||||a\xi-d\xi||<\epsilon ||b||$ and
3) $||ac\xi-bd\xi||\leq ||ac\xi-cd\xi||+||cd\xi-bd\xi||=||ca\xi-cd\xi||+||dc\xi-db\xi||\leq ||c||||a\xi-d\xi||+||d||||c\xi-b\xi||<||c||\epsilon+||d||\epsilon$.

Conclusion: if we could control the norms of $c,d$ then we're done. However, I'm not sure how I can do that. Somehow my first instinct was to use somehow Kaplansly density theorem, but now I doubt that it is related.

Thank you in advance!

Martin Argerami
  • 205,756

2 Answers2

3

(the argument below is extracted from Lemmas 7.2.13 and 7.2.14 of Kadison-Ringrose; the relevant more general theorems are Theorem 7.2.15 and Corollary 7.2.16)

If $x,y\in A'$ are selfadjoint, then we can find $\{a_n\}, \{b_n\}\subset A$, selfadjoint, with $a_n\xi\to x\xi$ and $b_n\xi\to y\xi$. Indeed, since $\xi$ is cyclic we can get $c_n$ in $A$ with $c_n\xi\to x\xi$. Then \begin{align} \|c_n^*\xi-x\xi\|^2 &=\langle (c_n^*-x)\xi,(c_n^*-x)\xi\rangle =\langle (c_n-x)(c_n^*-x)\xi,\xi\rangle\\ \ \\ &=\langle (c_n^*-x)(c_n-x)\xi,\xi\rangle =\langle (c_n-x)\xi,(c_n-x)\xi\rangle\\ \ \\ &=\|c_n\xi-x\xi\|^2\to0 \end{align} ($c_n$ commutes with $c_n^*$ because $A$ is abelian, and with $x$ because $x\in A'$). Now we can take $a_n=(c_n+c_n^*)/2$ and do similar for $y$.

Now, for any $c\in A$, \begin{align} \langle xy\,\xi,c\xi\rangle&=\langle y\xi,xc\xi\rangle =\langle y\xi,cx\xi\rangle =\lim_n\langle b_n\xi,ca_n\xi\rangle =\lim_n\langle a_nb_n\xi,c\xi\rangle =\lim_n\langle b_na_n\xi,c\xi\rangle\\ \ \\ &=\lim_n\langle a_n\xi,b_nc\xi\rangle =\lim_n\langle a_n\xi,cb_n\xi\rangle =\langle x\xi,cy\xi\rangle =\langle x\xi,yc\xi\rangle =\langle yx\xi,c\xi\rangle \end{align} (there is no issue with the joint limit since convergent sequences in a metric space are bounded). As $\{c\xi:\ c\in A\}$ is dense in $H$, we deduce that $xy\xi=yx\xi$. But $\xi$ is separating for $A'$, so $xy=yx$. As the selfadjoint elements of $A'$ span all of $A'$, it follows that $A'$ is abelian.

As a remark, note that since $A$ is abelian, $A'\xi\supset A\xi,$ so $A'\xi$ is dense in $H$; that is, $\xi$ is cyclic for $A'$. So $\xi$ is separating for $A''$, and as $A\subset A''$, we have that $\xi$ is separating for $A$. That is, if $A$ is abelian and $\xi$ is cyclic for $A$, then it is also separating.

Martin Argerami
  • 205,756
  • 1
    You are welcome. Kadison-Ringrose push these ideas further to show that there is an anti-isomorphism $A\to A'$. Alternatively, as Luiz mentions, this anti-isomorphism can be obtained via Tomita's $M'=JMJ$. – Martin Argerami Jun 12 '16 at 19:31
1

The only solution I can see uses Tomita-Takesaki theory: Let $M=A''$ be the von Neumann algebra generated by $A$, so that $M$ is also abelian, i.e., $M\subseteq M'$.

Note that $M'=A'''=A'$, so we are done if we show that $M'=M$ (in fact, this implies that $M$ is maximal abelian). We already have one inclusion $M\subseteq M'$.

Since $\xi$ is cyclic for $A$, it is also cyclic for $M$. Since $\xi$ is separating for $A'$, then it is separating for $M\subseteq A'$.

Let $J:H\to H$ be the modular conjugation of Tomita-Takesaki, i.e., $J=J^{-1}$ and $M'=JMJ$, so that $$M'=JMJ\subseteq JM'J=JJMJJ=M$$ therefore $M=M'$ is abelian.


In fact, these arguments prove the following: If $M$ is an abelian von Neumann algebra of $B(H)$ with a cyclic vector, then $M=M'$,i.e., $M$ is maximal abelian.

Luiz Cordeiro
  • 18,513
  • Thank you! I wasn't familiar with Tomita-Takesaki theory. – Shirly Geffen Jun 12 '16 at 14:04
  • 1
    @Luiz, just a small comment: it is not true that $J\in B(H)$, since it is not linear. Also, to have Tomita's equality $M'=JMJ$ you need the cyclic vector to also be separating; this happens in this case since $A$ is abelian, see the comment at the end of my answer. Finally, from $M'=JMJ$ you already get that $M'$ is abelian; and then you have $$M\subset M'\subset M''=M,$$ so $M'=M$. – Martin Argerami Jun 12 '16 at 19:29
  • 1
    @MartinArgerami You are right about $J$ not being in $B(H)$! Thanks. I did mention that "Since $\xi$ is separating for $A'$, then it is separating for $M\subseteq A'$". I was aware of your last comment, but in this case I think it is important to mention (for people not familiar with Tomita-Takesaki) that the map $M\to M'$, $x\mapsto JxJ$ is not a W*-algebra isomorphism. Again, thanks for the comments. – Luiz Cordeiro Jun 12 '16 at 19:41
  • Sorry, I missed the line about the separating vector. My bad. – Martin Argerami Jun 12 '16 at 20:26